Villanueva v. Select Portfolio Services, Inc. et al

Filing 15

ORDER SUBMITTING Defendants' motion to dismiss and VACATING the April 23, 2015 hearing on the motion; VACATING the parties' April 16, 2015 case management conference; and RESETTING the case management conference to July 2, 2015. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/10/2015. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 RAFAEL VILLANUEVA, Case No. 14-cv-05238-BLF Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SUBMITTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT 12 13 Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and National Default Servicing Corporation 14 have moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint under Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has not filed an 15 opposition to the motion, which is set to be heard on April 23, 2015. The Court finds that this 16 motion is appropriate for determination without oral argument, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7- 17 1(b), and hereby SUBMITS the motion without oral argument, and VACATES the motion 18 hearing. 19 The parties are also scheduled to appear for case management on April 16, 2015. 20 Defendants indicate in their case management statement that Plaintiff’s counsel has not responded 21 to attempts to meet and confer regarding case management. See ECF 14 at 1 n.1. Because of this, 22 and the pending motion to dismiss, the Court HEREBY VACATES the April 16, 2015 case 23 management conference, and RESETS the conference to July 2, 2015. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 10, 2015 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?