SoftVault Systems Inc. v. Sensus USA Inc

Filing 27

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 3/25/2015. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 SOFTVAULT SYSTEMS INC., Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: 14-CV-05411-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER v. SENSUS USA INC, Defendant. Plaintiff’s Attorney: P.J. O’Mahoney Defendant’s Attorney: Marc Peters An initial case management conference was held on March 25, 2015. A further case management conference is set for July 8, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file their joint case management statement by July 1, 2015. The Court adopts the parties’ proposed discovery limits set forth in their joint case management statement as follows:  Each party is limited to 25 interrogatories.  Each party is limited to 50 requests for admissions, not including requests for admission for the purpose of authenticating documents.  Each party is limited to 75 requests for production.  Each party is limited to 7 total hours of expert witness deposition testimony for each expert retained by the opposing party. However, should an expert issue more than one expert report, the opposing party is entitled to 7 additional hours of expert witness deposition testimony for each additional expert report issued by the particular expert.  Each party is limited to 10 total fact witness depositions and 70 total hours of fact witness deposition testimony. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) depositions are included in 1 Case No.: 14-CV-05411-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 3 the 70 total hours. All 30(b)(6) testimony is limited to 14 hours per side regardless of the number of 30(b)(6) topics or witnesses. In no event shall any single deposition of a witness exceed 7 hours on the record, with the exception of an expert witness who may be deposed for 7 hours per report provided, and 30(b)(6) witnesses who may be deposed pursuant to the 14 hour limitation above. 4 The Court set the following case schedule: 1 2 5 Exchange of Initial Disclosures 4/17/2015 Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions Invalidity Contentions 5/1/2015 Parties Exchange Proposed Claim Terms for Construction Last Day to Meet and Confer on Proposed Terms Parties Exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions and Identify Supporting Evidence and Experts Last Day to Meet and Confer on Narrowing Issues and Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Parties File Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Close of Claim Construction Discovery 6/26/2015 16 Claim Construction Opening Briefs Due 9/25/2015 17 Claim Construction Responsive Briefs Due 10/16/2015 18 Claim Construction Reply Briefs Due 10/30/2015 19 Technology Tutorial 12/3/2015, at 1:30 p.m. 20 Claim Construction Hearing 12/10/2015, at 1:30 p.m. 21 Last Day to Amend Pleadings / Add Parties 1/15/2016 22 Fact Discovery Cutoff 5/6/2016 Parties Serve Initial Expert Reports 6/10/2016 Parties Serve Rebuttal Expert Reports 7/13/2016 Close Expert Discovery 8/12/2016 Last Day to File Dispositive Motions 9/1/2016 Hearing on Dispositive Motions 10/13/2016, at 1:30 p.m. 6 7 8 9 10 11 United States District Court Northern District of California  12 13 14 15 23 24 25 26 6/12/2015 7/10/2015 7/17/2015 7/31/2015 8/14/2015 8/28/2015 27 28 2 Case No.: 14-CV-05411-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 2 Final Pretrial Conference 12/22/2016, at 1:30 p.m. Jury Trial 1/16/2017, at 9 a.m. Length of Trial 1 5 days 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 25, 2015 6 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No.: 14-CV-05411-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?