SoftVault Systems Inc. v. Sensus USA Inc
Filing
27
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 3/25/2015. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
SOFTVAULT SYSTEMS INC.,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: 14-CV-05411-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
v.
SENSUS USA INC,
Defendant.
Plaintiff’s Attorney: P.J. O’Mahoney
Defendant’s Attorney: Marc Peters
An initial case management conference was held on March 25, 2015. A further case
management conference is set for July 8, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file their joint case
management statement by July 1, 2015.
The Court adopts the parties’ proposed discovery limits set forth in their joint case
management statement as follows:
Each party is limited to 25 interrogatories.
Each party is limited to 50 requests for admissions, not including requests for admission
for the purpose of authenticating documents.
Each party is limited to 75 requests for production.
Each party is limited to 7 total hours of expert witness deposition testimony for each expert
retained by the opposing party. However, should an expert issue more than one expert
report, the opposing party is entitled to 7 additional hours of expert witness deposition
testimony for each additional expert report issued by the particular expert.
Each party is limited to 10 total fact witness depositions and 70 total hours of fact witness
deposition testimony. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) depositions are included in
1
Case No.: 14-CV-05411-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
3
the 70 total hours. All 30(b)(6) testimony is limited to 14 hours per side regardless of the
number of 30(b)(6) topics or witnesses.
In no event shall any single deposition of a witness exceed 7 hours on the record, with the
exception of an expert witness who may be deposed for 7 hours per report provided, and
30(b)(6) witnesses who may be deposed pursuant to the 14 hour limitation above.
4
The Court set the following case schedule:
1
2
5
Exchange of Initial Disclosures
4/17/2015
Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
Infringement Contentions
Invalidity Contentions
5/1/2015
Parties Exchange Proposed Claim Terms for
Construction
Last Day to Meet and Confer on Proposed
Terms
Parties Exchange Preliminary Claim
Constructions and Identify Supporting Evidence
and Experts
Last Day to Meet and Confer on Narrowing
Issues and Joint Claim Construction and
Prehearing Statement
Parties File Joint Claim Construction and
Prehearing Statement
Close of Claim Construction Discovery
6/26/2015
16
Claim Construction Opening Briefs Due
9/25/2015
17
Claim Construction Responsive Briefs Due
10/16/2015
18
Claim Construction Reply Briefs Due
10/30/2015
19
Technology Tutorial
12/3/2015, at 1:30 p.m.
20
Claim Construction Hearing
12/10/2015, at 1:30 p.m.
21
Last Day to Amend Pleadings / Add Parties
1/15/2016
22
Fact Discovery Cutoff
5/6/2016
Parties Serve Initial Expert Reports
6/10/2016
Parties Serve Rebuttal Expert Reports
7/13/2016
Close Expert Discovery
8/12/2016
Last Day to File Dispositive Motions
9/1/2016
Hearing on Dispositive Motions
10/13/2016, at 1:30 p.m.
6
7
8
9
10
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
12
13
14
15
23
24
25
26
6/12/2015
7/10/2015
7/17/2015
7/31/2015
8/14/2015
8/28/2015
27
28
2
Case No.: 14-CV-05411-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
2
Final Pretrial Conference
12/22/2016, at 1:30 p.m.
Jury Trial
1/16/2017, at 9 a.m.
Length of Trial
1
5 days
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 25, 2015
6
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No.: 14-CV-05411-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?