Le et al v. Zuffa, LLC

Filing 78

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. These parties will participate in mediation with a mutually agreed upon mediator at a time to be agreed upon not later than September 30, 2015 in satisfaction of the parties' ADR obligations in this case pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/17/2015. Motions terminated: (28 in 5:15-cv-00521-EJD) STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Zuffa, LLC filed by Zuffa, LLC, (77 in 5:14-cv- 05484-EJD) STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Zuffa, LLC filed by Zuffa, LLC, (21 in 5:15-cv-01324-EJD) STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Zuffa, LLC filed by Zuffa, LLC, (50 in 5:14-c v-05591-EJD) STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Zuffa, LLC filed by Zuffa, LLC, (50 in 5:14-cv-05621-EJD) STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Zuffa, LLC filed by Zuffa, LLC (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2015)

Download PDF
1 [Counsel listed on signature pages] 2 3 4 5 6 7 B O I E S , S C H I L L E R & F L E X N E R O A K L A N D , C A L I F O R N I A L L P 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 Cung Le, Nathan Quarry, Jon Fitch, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 5:14-cv-05484 EJD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Plaintiffs, v. Zuffa, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, 16 Defendant. 17 Luis Javier Vazquez and Dennis Lloyd Hallman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 18 19 Case No. 5:14-cv-05591 EJD Plaintiffs, 20 21 22 23 24 v. Zuffa, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, Defendant. 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process Case Nos. 5:14-cv-05484 EJD; 5:14-cv-05591 EJD 5:14-cv-05621 EJD; 5:15-cv-00521 EJD; 5:15-cv-01324 EJD 1 2 Brandon Vera and Pablo Garza, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 3 v. 4 5 6 7 B O I E S , S C H I L L E R & F L E X N E R O A K L A N D , C A L I F O R N I A L L P 8 Case No. 5:14-cv-05621 EJD Zuffa, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, Defendant. Gabe Ruediger and Mac Danzig, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 9 Case No. 5:15-cv-00521 EJD Plaintiffs, 10 v. 11 Zuffa, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, 12 Defendant. 13 14 15 Kyle Kingsbury and Darren Uyenoyama, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Case No. 5:15-cv-01324 EJD 16 Plaintiffs, 17 18 19 20 21 v. Zuffa, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process Case Nos. 5:14-cv-05484 EJD; 5:14-cv-05591 EJD 5:14-cv-05621 EJD; 5:15-cv-00521 EJD; 5:15-cv-01324 EJD 1 2 3 4 5 6 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: WHEREAS, the parties agree to participate in mediation with a mutually agreed upon mediator; WHEREAS, the parties believe that mediation would be premature at this stage of the case in light of the pending and anticipated motions and other factors; B O I E S , S C H I L L E R & F L E X N E R O A K L A N D , C A L I F O R N I A WHEREAS, the parties believe that meeting and conferring on the appropriate date for 8 L L P 7 mediation would be more productive when the case is farther advanced, and agree to meet and 9 confer no later than September 30, 2015 to agree upon an appropriate schedule for mediation; 10 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Cung Le, 11 Nathan Quarry, Jon Fitch, Luis Vazquez, Dennis Hallman, Brandon Vera, Pablo Garza, Gabe 12 Ruediger, Mac Danzig, Kyle Kingsbury, and Darren Uyenoyama and Defendant Zuffa, LLC d/b/a 13 Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, through their respective attorneys, subject to the 14 Court’s approval, that these parties will participate in mediation with a mutually agreed upon 15 mediator at a time to be agreed upon not later than September 30, 2015 in satisfaction of the 16 parties’ ADR obligations in this case pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. 17 18 Dated: April 16, 2015 /s/ Joseph R. Saveri________________ Joseph R. Saveri 19 Joseph R. Saveri #130064 (jsaveri@saverilawfirm.com) JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM, INC. 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 625 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 500-6800; Fax: (415) 395-9940 20 21 22 23 24 Attorney for Plaintiffs and Representative Plaintiffs Cung Le, Nathan Quarry, Jon Fitch, Luis Javier Vazquez, Dennis Lloyd Hallman, Brandon Vera, Pablo Garza, Gabe Ruediger, Mac Danzig, Kyle Kingsbury and Darren Uyenoyama 25 26 27 28 1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process Case Nos. 5:14-cv-05484 EJD; 5:14-cv-05591 EJD 5:14-cv-05621 EJD; 5:15-cv-00521 EJD; 5:15-cv-01324 EJD 1 Dated: April 16, 2015 /s/ John F. Cove, Jr.________________ John. F. Cove, Jr. 2 6 John F. Cove, Jr. #212213 (jcove@bsfllp.com) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900, Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1000; Fax: (510) 874-1460 7 Attorney for Defendant Zuffa, LLC 3 4 5 B O I E S , S C H I L L E R & F L E X N E R O A K L A N D , C A L I F O R N I A L L P 8 9 10 Pursuant to L.R. 5.1(i)(3), I attest that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. 11 Dated: April 16, 2015 By: /s/ John F. Cove, Jr. ____________ John F. Cove, Jr. 12 13 14 [PROPOSED] ORDER 15 ☐ X The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 ☐ The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 4/17 _____________________, 2015 20 21 _______________________________________ THE HONORABLE EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process Case Nos. 5:14-cv-05484 EJD; 5:14-cv-05591 EJD 5:14-cv-05621 EJD; 5:15-cv-00521 EJD; 5:15-cv-01324 EJD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?