Cecil Shaw v. Kim Chhun Ung et al

Filing 23

ORDER granting 22 Stipulation for Dismissal of Action. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/4/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2015)

Download PDF
6 7 ER R NIA J . D av i l a LI d w a rd J u d ge E H Attorney for Plaintiff Cecil Shaw RT 5 NO 4 I A 3 ERED ORD T IS SO FO S 2 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com UNIT ED 1 RT U O S DISTRICT TE C TA N D IS T IC T R OF C 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 The Clerk shall close this file. 11/4/2015 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 CECIL SHAW, ) No. 5:14-cv-05564-EJD ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION ) vs. ) KIM CHHUN UNG dba FOSTERS FREEZE, ) ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION Page 1 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cecil Shaw and Defendants 2 Kim Chhun Ung dba Fosters Freeze; Huylang Ung dba Fosters Freeze; Daniel Yong Taing; and 3 Linda Heng, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to 4 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed 5 with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 6 7 Dated: November 4, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 8 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff, Cecil Shaw 9 10 11 12 Dated: November 4, 2015 Law Offices of Leonard Cravens 13 14 15 16 17 /s/ Leonard J. Cravens Leonard J. Cravens Attorney for Defendants, Kim Chhun Ung dba Fosters Freeze; Huylang Ung dba Fosters Freeze; Daniel Yong Taing; and Linda Heng 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?