Cecil Shaw v. Kim Chhun Ung et al
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 Stipulation for Dismissal of Action. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/4/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2015)
6
7
ER
R NIA
J . D av i l
a
LI
d w a rd
J u d ge E
H
Attorney for Plaintiff
Cecil Shaw
RT
5
NO
4
I
A
3
ERED
ORD
T IS SO
FO
S
2
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
UNIT
ED
1
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
The Clerk shall
close this file.
11/4/2015
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
CECIL SHAW,
) No. 5:14-cv-05564-EJD
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION
)
vs.
)
KIM CHHUN UNG dba FOSTERS FREEZE, )
)
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Page 1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cecil Shaw and Defendants
2
Kim Chhun Ung dba Fosters Freeze; Huylang Ung dba Fosters Freeze; Daniel Yong Taing; and
3
Linda Heng, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to
4
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed
5
with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
6
7
Dated: November 4, 2015
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
8
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Cecil Shaw
9
10
11
12
Dated: November 4, 2015
Law Offices of Leonard Cravens
13
14
15
16
17
/s/ Leonard J. Cravens
Leonard J. Cravens
Attorney for Defendants,
Kim Chhun Ung dba Fosters Freeze;
Huylang Ung dba Fosters Freeze;
Daniel Yong Taing; and Linda Heng
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?