IPtronics Inc. et al v. Avago Technologies U.S., Inc. et al
Filing
20
ORDER REGARDING 3 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 1/23/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2015)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
7
IPTRONICS INC., et al.,
Case No. 14-cv-05647-BLF
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., et
al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
ORDER REGARDING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL
Defendants.
[Re: ECF 3]
12
13
Before the Court is the Administrative Motion to File Document Under Seal by Plaintiffs
14
IPTronics, Inc. and Mellanox Technologies Denmark APS, whereby Plaintiffs seek to seal certain
15
portions of their Complaint that contain information designated “confidential” by Defendants
16
pursuant to protective orders entered in other litigation between the parties. Admin. Mot., ECF 3.
17
As this action was initiated on December 29, 2014, Defendants have not yet appeared.
18
Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) provides that when a party seeks to seal information designated
19
confidential by another party, the designating party shall provide a declaration in support of
20
sealing within 4 days of the filing of the administrative sealing request. Given the peculiar posture
21
of this sealing request, the Court shall permit Defendants to file a supporting declaration within
22
four (4) days of the date when they make their initial appearance. Failure to file a declaration by
23
this extended deadline shall result in an order denying the sealing request pursuant to Civil Local
24
Rule 79-5(e)(2). Plaintiffs are ordered to certify service of this order on Defendants.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 23, 2015
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?