IPtronics Inc. et al v. Avago Technologies U.S., Inc. et al

Filing 51

ORDER ALLOWING SUBSTITUTE BRIEFING, re: 43 ; STRIKING 44 OPPOSITION AND 45 REPLY BRIEF. 48 Motion for leave to file sur-reply denied as moot. Substitute Opposition due by 5/14/2015. Substitute Reply due by 5/21/2015. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 4/28/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2015)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

SAN JOSE DIVISION

6
7

IPTRONICS INC., et al.,

Case No. 14-cv-05647-BLF

Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., et
al.,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

ORDER ALLOWING SUBSTITUTE
BRIEFING; STRIKING OPPOSITION
AND REPLY BRIEF

Defendants.

[Re: ECF 44, 45, 48]

12
13

The Court has reviewed the administrative motion for leave to file a sur-reply filed by

14

Plaintiffs, ECF 48, as well as Defendants’ opposition thereto, ECF 49. The Court considers the

15

corrected motion that Defendants filed on March 23, 2015 at ECF 43 to be the operative motion.

16

As such, and in the interest of fairness and clarity, the Court finds good cause to STRIKE

17

Plaintiffs’ opposition brief filed on March 23, 2015 (ECF 44) and Defendants’ reply brief filed on

18

March 30, 2015 (ECF 45) with leave to file substitute briefing relating to the operative corrected

19

motion at ECF 43. This will afford both parties the opportunity to address the changes made in

20

Defendants’ corrected motion.

21

Plaintiffs’ substitute opposition brief shall be due by May 14, 2015. Defendants’

22

substitute reply brief shall be due by May 21, 2015. No additional pages will be permitted, and

23

both parties are advised that the Court will not consider new evidence introduced for the first time

24

in a reply brief.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 28, 2015
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge