George E Rollins v. Behrooz Abdi et al

Filing 15

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED. The court orders Plaintiff to file in Case No. 3:15-cv-00085-JD an administrative motion to consider whether this and the other three named cases should be related pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(b). The motion shall be filed on or before 3/6/2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/3/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 GEORGE E. ROLLINS, Case No. 5:15-cv-00184-EJD Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 11 BEHROOZ ABDI, et al., ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 Since Plaintiff has identified that the instant action is related to three other cases currently 14 pending in this district, namely Karr v. Abdi, Case No. 5:15-cv-00200-NC; McMillan v. 15 InvenSense, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-00084-JD; and Lendales v. InvenSense, Inc., Case No. 3:15- 16 cv-00142-VC; the court orders Plaintiff to file in Case No. 3:15-cv-00085-JD an administrative 17 motion to consider whether this and the other three named cases should be related pursuant to 18 Civil Local Rule 3-12(b). The motion shall be filed on or before March 6, 2015. 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 3, 2015 ______________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 5:15-cv-00184-EJD ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?