George E Rollins v. Behrooz Abdi et al
Filing
15
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED. The court orders Plaintiff to file in Case No. 3:15-cv-00085-JD an administrative motion to consider whether this and the other three named cases should be related pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(b). The motion shall be filed on or before 3/6/2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/3/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
GEORGE E. ROLLINS,
Case No. 5:15-cv-00184-EJD
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
11
BEHROOZ ABDI, et al.,
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
FILE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONSIDER WHETHER CASES
SHOULD BE RELATED
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
Since Plaintiff has identified that the instant action is related to three other cases currently
14
pending in this district, namely Karr v. Abdi, Case No. 5:15-cv-00200-NC; McMillan v.
15
InvenSense, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-00084-JD; and Lendales v. InvenSense, Inc., Case No. 3:15-
16
cv-00142-VC; the court orders Plaintiff to file in Case No. 3:15-cv-00085-JD an administrative
17
motion to consider whether this and the other three named cases should be related pursuant to
18
Civil Local Rule 3-12(b). The motion shall be filed on or before March 6, 2015.
19
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 3, 2015
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 5:15-cv-00184-EJD
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER
WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?