Lea v. LinkedIn Corporation

Filing 32

ORDER granting 31 Dismissal. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/24/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2015)

Download PDF
10 11 ER rd J . D a R NIA d wa J u d ge E vila H 9 RT 8 NO 7 STEVEN A. SCHWARTZ TIMOTHY N. MATHEWS CHRISTINA D. SALER CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP One Haverford Centre 361 W. Lancaster Avenue Haverford, PA 19041 Telephone: (610) 642-8500 Facsimile: (610) 649-3633 Email: steveschwartz@chimiclesc.om timothymathews@chimiclesc.om cds@chimiclesc.om FO 6 LI 5 A 4 RT U O 3 S 2 JAMES C. SHAH (SBN 260435) ROSE F. LUZON (SBN 221544) SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP ES DISTRIC TC One California Street, Suite 900 AT T San Francisco, California, 94111-5401 Telephone: (415) 429-5272 Facsimile: (866) 300-7367 Email: jshah@sfmslaw.com TED GRAN rluzon@sfmslaw.com UNIT ED 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C The Clerk shall close this file. 8/24/2015 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 16 17 18 BRANTON LEA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 19 Case No. 15-cv-00236 NC Plaintiff, Judge: Hon. Edward J. Davila 20 21 vs. LINKEDIN CORPORATION, 22 Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(i), Plaintiff Branton Lea, by and through his counsel, hereby voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned action with prejudice with each side to bear its own costs. 28 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 15-CV-00236 NC 27790473.1 1 Dated: August 22, 2015 SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP JAMES C. SHAH 2 CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP STEVEN A. SCHWARTZ TIMOTHY N. MATHEWS CHRISTINA D. SALER 3 4 5 By: 6 /s/James C. Shah JAMES C. SHAH 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 15-CV-00236 NC 27790473.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?