Lea v. LinkedIn Corporation
Filing
32
ORDER granting 31 Dismissal. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/24/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2015)
10
11
ER
rd J . D a
R NIA
d wa
J u d ge E
vila
H
9
RT
8
NO
7
STEVEN A. SCHWARTZ
TIMOTHY N. MATHEWS
CHRISTINA D. SALER
CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP
One Haverford Centre
361 W. Lancaster Avenue
Haverford, PA 19041
Telephone:
(610) 642-8500
Facsimile:
(610) 649-3633
Email: steveschwartz@chimiclesc.om
timothymathews@chimiclesc.om
cds@chimiclesc.om
FO
6
LI
5
A
4
RT
U
O
3
S
2
JAMES C. SHAH (SBN 260435)
ROSE F. LUZON (SBN 221544)
SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP ES DISTRIC
TC
One California Street, Suite 900
AT
T
San Francisco, California, 94111-5401
Telephone:
(415) 429-5272
Facsimile:
(866) 300-7367
Email: jshah@sfmslaw.com
TED
GRAN
rluzon@sfmslaw.com
UNIT
ED
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
The Clerk shall
close this file.
8/24/2015
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
16
17
18
BRANTON LEA, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
19
Case No. 15-cv-00236 NC
Plaintiff,
Judge: Hon. Edward J. Davila
20
21
vs.
LINKEDIN CORPORATION,
22
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(i), Plaintiff Branton Lea, by and
through his counsel, hereby voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned action with prejudice with
each side to bear its own costs.
28
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 15-CV-00236 NC
27790473.1
1
Dated: August 22, 2015
SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP
JAMES C. SHAH
2
CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP
STEVEN A. SCHWARTZ
TIMOTHY N. MATHEWS
CHRISTINA D. SALER
3
4
5
By:
6
/s/James C. Shah
JAMES C. SHAH
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 15-CV-00236 NC
27790473.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?