J.A.L. v. Santos et al
Filing
16
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on May 20, 2015. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No.: 15-cv-00355-LHK
J.A.L.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
v.
MIKE SANTOS, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff’s Attorney: Jaime Leanos
Defendants’ Attorney: Aimee Hamoy-Perera
An initial case management conference was held on May 20, 2015. A further case
management conference is set for August 26, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file their joint
case management statement by August 19, 2015.
21
22
23
24
25
The Court referred the parties to a magistrate judge settlement conference with Judge
Cousins with a 150-day deadline.
The Court set a limit of 20 depositions in this case. The discovery limits of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure will otherwise apply in this case.
The Court set the following case schedule:
26
FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: December 30, 2015
27
EXPERT DISCOVERY:
28
1
Case No.: 15-cv-00355-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
Opening Reports: February 1, 2016
Rebuttal Reports: February 16, 2016
Close of Expert Discovery: March 1, 2016
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS shall be filed by March 18, 2016, and set for hearing no later than
April 28, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. The parties are limited to one dispositive motion per side in
the entire case.
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: July 7, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.
JURY TRIAL: July 18, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. Trial is expected to last 5 days.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 20, 2015
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 15-cv-00355-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?