J.A.L. v. Santos et al

Filing 16

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on May 20, 2015. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Case No.: 15-cv-00355-LHK J.A.L., Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER v. MIKE SANTOS, et al., Defendants. 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff’s Attorney: Jaime Leanos Defendants’ Attorney: Aimee Hamoy-Perera An initial case management conference was held on May 20, 2015. A further case management conference is set for August 26, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file their joint case management statement by August 19, 2015. 21 22 23 24 25 The Court referred the parties to a magistrate judge settlement conference with Judge Cousins with a 150-day deadline. The Court set a limit of 20 depositions in this case. The discovery limits of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will otherwise apply in this case. The Court set the following case schedule: 26 FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: December 30, 2015 27 EXPERT DISCOVERY: 28 1 Case No.: 15-cv-00355-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 Opening Reports: February 1, 2016 Rebuttal Reports: February 16, 2016 Close of Expert Discovery: March 1, 2016 DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS shall be filed by March 18, 2016, and set for hearing no later than April 28, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. The parties are limited to one dispositive motion per side in the entire case. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: July 7, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. JURY TRIAL: July 18, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. Trial is expected to last 5 days. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 20, 2015 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 15-cv-00355-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?