ET Trading, LTD v. Clearplex Direct, LLC et al

Filing 10

ORDER RE TRO. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on February 12, 2015. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 ET TRADING, LTD, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 Case No.:15-CV-00426-LHK ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND OSC RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION v. CLEARPLEX DIRECT, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 9 Defendants. 17 18 On February 11, 2015, Plaintiff ET Trading, LTD (“Plaintiff” or “ET”) filed this ex parte 19 application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and preliminary injunction against 20 Defendants ClearPlex Direct, LLC and ClearPlex Corporation (collectively, “Defendants”). See 21 TRO Application (“TRO App.”), ECF No. 9. On February 11, 2015, Plaintiff provided notice of 22 its TRO application to Defendants via email to Peter Jensen, President of ClearPlex Corporation 23 (“CP-Corp”) and Chris Tomaszewski, Vice Present and Legal Counsel of ClearPlex Direct, LLC 24 (“CP-Direct”). See Declaration of Leigh O. Curran, ECF No. 9-5. 25 26 27 28 Defendants are hereby ordered to file a response to Plaintiff’s TRO application by February 18, 2015. 1 Case No.: 15-CV-00426-LHK ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND OSC RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: February 12, 2015 3 4 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 15-CV-00426-LHK ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND OSC RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?