Lopez et al v. OneWest Bank, FSB et al

Filing 95

ORDER RE 71 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 ALEX LOPEZ, et al., Case No. 15-cv-00759-BLF Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES 9 10 CIT BANK, N.A., et al., [Re: ECF 71] Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Plaintiffs are requested to provide the Court with a summary of hours expended on the 13 14 major tasks necessary to prosecute this action as set forth on the chart below. The Court expects 15 that the total number of hours will equal the hours set forth in the Motion for Attorney Fees, and 16 as revised in the time sheets submitted as Exhibit 5 to ECF No. 84 in support of the Motion. The 17 information requested will provide the Court with a clear understanding of the Lodestar amount 18 requested by Plaintiffs and assist the Court in assessing the reasonableness of the hours expended. 19 20 Task 21 Pre-Suit Investigation 22 Drafting Initial Complaint 23 Motion to Dismiss 24 Drafting Amended Complaints 25 Discovery, including motions 26 Case Management Conferences and Filings 27 ADR and Settlement Discussions and Briefs 28 Hours 1 Miscellaneous (describe) 2 Total 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: April 18, 2016 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?