Lopez et al v. OneWest Bank, FSB et al
Filing
95
ORDER RE 71 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2016)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
7
ALEX LOPEZ, et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-00759-BLF
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
9
10
CIT BANK, N.A., et al.,
[Re: ECF 71]
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Plaintiffs are requested to provide the Court with a summary of hours expended on the
13
14
major tasks necessary to prosecute this action as set forth on the chart below. The Court expects
15
that the total number of hours will equal the hours set forth in the Motion for Attorney Fees, and
16
as revised in the time sheets submitted as Exhibit 5 to ECF No. 84 in support of the Motion. The
17
information requested will provide the Court with a clear understanding of the Lodestar amount
18
requested by Plaintiffs and assist the Court in assessing the reasonableness of the hours expended.
19
20
Task
21
Pre-Suit Investigation
22
Drafting Initial Complaint
23
Motion to Dismiss
24
Drafting Amended Complaints
25
Discovery, including motions
26
Case Management Conferences and Filings
27
ADR and Settlement Discussions and Briefs
28
Hours
1
Miscellaneous (describe)
2
Total
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
Dated: April 18, 2016
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?