Gonzalez v. Nor-Cal Insulation, Inc., et al

Filing 8

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE 7 . Case Management Statement due by 6/17/2015. Case Management Conference set for 6/24/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 4/23/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 TOMAS E. MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555 HUY TRAN, Bar No. 288196 Justice at Work Law Group 84 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 790 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 317-1100 Facsimile: (408) 351-0105 Tomas@JAWLawGroup.com Huy@JAWLawGroup.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 YONATHAN I. GONZALEZ 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Case No.: 15-793 NC 12 YONATHAN I. GONZALEZ, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 60 DAYS PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16-2(d); DECLARATION OF TOMAS E. MARGAIN IN SUPPORT THEREOF; and PROPOSED ORDER 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 v. 16 17 NOR-CAL INSULATION, INC.; LUIS 18 RAMOS BERMUDEZ; JOSE GUADALUPE 19 LUCATERO, 20 21 22 23 24 25 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES WHO HAVE MADE AN APPEARANCE IN THIS ACTION. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-2(d), as well as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff hereby requests that the initial Case Management Conference set for April 29, 2015 be 1 MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC 1 continued approximately (60) days to June 24, 2015 (Wednesday) at 10:00 am or the next 2 available Wednesday on the Court’s calendar. As described below in the Declaration of Tomas 3 E. Margain, good cause exists. Within the last week, Defendants have retained counsel and the 4 corporate Defendant was served. Counsel for both parties have spoken, begun the Rule 26 5 6 7 8 process and wish time to get the pleadings settled, exchange information and hopefully resolve the matter or have the case referred to mediation. Dated: April 23, 2015 By: //s// TOMAS E. MARGAIN TOMAS E. MARGAIN 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC DECLARATION OF TOMAS E. MARGAIN 1 2 I, Tomas E. Margain, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney admitted to this Court and Plaintiff’s attorney of record. I base 3 this declaration on my personal knowledge unless otherwise indicated. 4 2. The Complaint was filed on February 23, 2015 and an initial CMC set for April 5 29, 2015 approximately 60 days from filing. 6 3. After filing the Complaint, I mailed a letter to Defendants and also put the 7 complaint out for service. I did delay service for about 30 days trying to get a response via a 8 letter. 9 4. On April 20, 2015, I spoke with Mike Dillingham, who I have worked with in the 10 past, who is representing Defendants. While there are lots of contested issues, we agreed to my 11 seeking to continue the initial CMC, focusing on our Rule 26 obligations and exchanges and 12 move towards mediation if we cannot otherwise resolve the matter. Based on the conversation, I 13 have also scheduled a meeting with Plaintiff to get authority to make a demand. 14 5. I am also informed that my process server did serve the home of one of the 15 Defendants who I believe may be the address of the agent for service of the corporation. Having 16 said that, Mr. Dillingham agreed to accept service. 17 18 19 6. Continuing the Initial CMC to June 24, 2015 will allow me to complete the above tasks. My hope is that at the very least, we would have agreed to mediation and submitted an order as well as having finished our Initial Disclosures before the Initial CMC. 20 21 22 23 24 I declare under penalties of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and accurate. Executed on April 23, 2015 in San Jose, California. By: //s//TOMAS E. MARGAIN//s// TOMAS E. MARGAIN 25 3 MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-2(d), the Court has the authority to modify the Initial 2 Case Management Order upon a motion by a party seeking relief from such an order. Here, 3 counsel have met and conferred about the continuance. Also, good cause exists. A continuance 4 will allow the pleadings to be settled and counsel to have complied with ADR and Rule 26 5 obligations. Moreover, the time will allow the parties to explore a settlement. 6 7 Dated: APRIL 23, 2015 8 9 By: //s// TOMAS E. MARGAIN TOMAS E. MARGAIN 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 FOR THE 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 Case No.: 15-793 NC YONATHAN I. GONZALEZ, 6 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16-2(d) Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 9 NOR-CAL INSULATION, INC.; LUIS 10 RAMOS BERMUDEZ; JOSE GUADALUPE 11 LUCATERO, 12 13 Defendants 14 15 16 BASED ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONTINUE, THE COURT’S FILE AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 17 18 The initial Case Management Conference and Rule 26 Deadlines are continued as follows: 19 20 June 12, 2015  21 22 Last Day to Meet and Confer Regarding Initial Discloses, ADR process election and discovery plan.  Last Day to file ADR Certificate signed by Parties and Counsel.  Last Day to either file a stipulation to ARD Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone 23 24 Conference. 25 5 MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC June 18, 2015 1  Management Statement 3  June 24, 2015 5 8 Initial Case Management Conference in Courtroom 7,4h Floor, San Jose Courthouse at 10:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. S April 23, 2015 By: UNIT ED DATED: NATHANAEL COUSINS United States ANTED GR District Court Magistrate Judge 10 11 NO 12 RT 13 thanael Judge Na ER M. Cousin H 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 6 MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC RT U O 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 7  s FO 6 Last Day to File Magistrate Consent Form LI 4 Last Day to File Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures and file Joint Case A 2 N D IS T IC T R OF C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?