Jacob C. Steele v. Kim Holland

Filing 31

ORDER DENYING 30 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/18/2017. (blflc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 9 JACOB CHARLES STEELE, Plaintiff, 10 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 15-cv-01084-BLF v. 12 KIM HOLLAND, 13 Defendant. 14 15 On May 12, 2017, the Court denied Petitioner Jacob Steele’s petition for writ of habeas 16 corpus. ECF 25. The Court also denied a certificate of appealability because Petitioner did not 17 demonstrate that “reasonable jurists would find [this Court’s] assessment of the constitutional 18 claims debatable or wrong.” See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Now before the 19 Court is Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) for an appeal. ECF 30. 20 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) provides that an appeal may not be taken IFP if the trial court 21 certifies it is not taken in good faith. “Not taken in good faith” means “frivolous.” Ellis v. United 22 States, 356 U.S. 674, 674-75 (1958); Hooker v. Am. Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) 23 (equating “not taken in good faith” with “frivolous”). For the same reasons this Court denied a 24 certificate of appealability, this motion for IFP is also DENIED. 25 Petitioner may file a motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal in the court of appeals 26 within thirty days after service of notice of this order. See Fed. R. App. Proc. 24 (a)(5). Any such 27 motion “must include a copy of the affidavit filed in the district court and the district court’s 28 statement of reasons for its action.” Id. 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 6 Dated: July 18, 2017 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?