Jacob C. Steele v. Kim Holland
Filing
31
ORDER DENYING 30 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/18/2017. (blflc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
8
9
JACOB CHARLES STEELE,
Plaintiff,
10
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 15-cv-01084-BLF
v.
12
KIM HOLLAND,
13
Defendant.
14
15
On May 12, 2017, the Court denied Petitioner Jacob Steele’s petition for writ of habeas
16
corpus. ECF 25. The Court also denied a certificate of appealability because Petitioner did not
17
demonstrate that “reasonable jurists would find [this Court’s] assessment of the constitutional
18
claims debatable or wrong.” See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Now before the
19
Court is Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) for an appeal. ECF 30.
20
28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) provides that an appeal may not be taken IFP if the trial court
21
certifies it is not taken in good faith. “Not taken in good faith” means “frivolous.” Ellis v. United
22
States, 356 U.S. 674, 674-75 (1958); Hooker v. Am. Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002)
23
(equating “not taken in good faith” with “frivolous”). For the same reasons this Court denied a
24
certificate of appealability, this motion for IFP is also DENIED.
25
Petitioner may file a motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal in the court of appeals
26
within thirty days after service of notice of this order. See Fed. R. App. Proc. 24 (a)(5). Any such
27
motion “must include a copy of the affidavit filed in the district court and the district court’s
28
statement of reasons for its action.” Id.
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
6
Dated: July 18, 2017
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?