Phigenix, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.
Filing
126
ORDER GRANTING 85 MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/2/2015. (blflc3, COURT STAF) (Filed on 7/6/2015)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
7
PHIGENIX, INC.,
Case No. 15-cv-01238-BLF
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
GENENTECH INC,
Defendant.
[Re: ECF 85]
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
STRIKE DEFENDANT'S SIXTH
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, WITH
LEAVE TO AMEND
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff moves to strike Defendant’s sixth affirmative defense for inequitable conduct,
which Defendant opposes. The parties appeared for oral argument on the motion on July 2, 2015.
For the reasons stated on the record, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to strike,
16
with leave to amend. The Court finds that Defendant has failed to allege sufficient facts under the
17
heightened pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) to show egregious
18
misconduct. The Court further GRANTS Defendant leave to amend its materiality and intent
19
allegations in the sixth affirmative defense. Defendant is not permitted, absent further leave of
20
Court, to allege any additional affirmative defenses.
21
At the hearing on the motion, Defendant requested a deadline for amendment of July 13,
22
2015. The Court HEREBY ADOPTS this deadline. Any amended answer must therefore be filed
23
no later than July 13, 2015.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 2, 2015
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?