Diaz et al v. Premium Packing, Inc.

Filing 57

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY IN ANTICIPATION OF EVIDENTIARY HEARING re 56 Letter filed by Premium Packing, Inc., 55 Letter filed by Guillermo Cruz Cruz, Mario Ivan Espinoza Diaz. Given the parties' agreement to create a discovery plan in antici pation of the evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether there exists an arbitration agreement between Plaintiffs and Defendant, the court orders that any disputes with respect to such discovery - save for any disagreement on what discovery should be permitted - are referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/24/2016.(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MARIO IVAN ESPINOZA DIAZ, et al., Case No. 5:15-cv-01258-EJD Plaintiffs, 9 ORDER RE: DISCOVERY IN ANTICIPATION OF EVIDENTIARY HEARING v. 10 11 PREMIUM PACKING, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 55, 56 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 12 Given the parties’ agreement to create a discovery plan in anticipation of the evidentiary 13 14 hearing on the issue of whether there exists an arbitration agreement between Plaintiffs and 15 Defendant, the court orders that any disputes with respect to such discovery - save for any 16 disagreement on what discovery should be permitted - are referred to the assigned Magistrate 17 Judge. 18 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 24, 2016 ______________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 5:15-cv-01258-EJD ORDER RE: DISCOVERY IN ANTICIPATION OF EVIDENTIARY HEARING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?