Diaz et al v. Premium Packing, Inc.
Filing
57
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY IN ANTICIPATION OF EVIDENTIARY HEARING re 56 Letter filed by Premium Packing, Inc., 55 Letter filed by Guillermo Cruz Cruz, Mario Ivan Espinoza Diaz. Given the parties' agreement to create a discovery plan in antici pation of the evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether there exists an arbitration agreement between Plaintiffs and Defendant, the court orders that any disputes with respect to such discovery - save for any disagreement on what discovery should be permitted - are referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/24/2016.(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
MARIO IVAN ESPINOZA DIAZ, et al.,
Case No. 5:15-cv-01258-EJD
Plaintiffs,
9
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY IN
ANTICIPATION OF EVIDENTIARY
HEARING
v.
10
11
PREMIUM PACKING, INC.,
Re: Dkt. Nos. 55, 56
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendant.
12
Given the parties’ agreement to create a discovery plan in anticipation of the evidentiary
13
14
hearing on the issue of whether there exists an arbitration agreement between Plaintiffs and
15
Defendant, the court orders that any disputes with respect to such discovery - save for any
16
disagreement on what discovery should be permitted - are referred to the assigned Magistrate
17
Judge.
18
19
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 24, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 5:15-cv-01258-EJD
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY IN ANTICIPATION OF EVIDENTIARY HEARING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?