eBay, Inc. v. Exterro, Inc.
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE ADR PHONE CONFERENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (granting 25 ). Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/16/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Allonn E. Levy, Bar No. 187251
alevy@hopkinscarley.com
Christopher A. Hohn, Bar No. 271759
chohn@hopkinscarley.com
HOPKINS & CARLEY
A Law Corporation
The Letitia Building
70 South First Street
San Jose, CA 95113-2406
mailing address:
P.O. Box 1469
San Jose, CA 95109-1469
Telephone:
(408) 286-9800
Facsimile:
(408) 998-4790
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EBAY INC.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
EBAY INC.,
15
16
17
CASE NO. 5:15-CV-01311-BLF
Plaintiff,
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO RESCHEDULE ADR PHONE
CONFERENCE AND CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
EXTERRO, INC., and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
18
Defendants.
19
20
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.
21
22
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant eBay Inc.
23
(“eBay”) and Defendant and Counterclaimant Exterro, Inc. (“Exterro”) hereby stipulate and
24
jointly request that the Court reschedule: (1) the ADR Phone Conference currently set for June
25
29, 2015 at 11:30 a.m.; and (2) the Case Management Conference currently set for July 2, 2015 at
26
1:30 p.m. Unfortunately, as currently scheduled, the ADR Phone Conference overlaps with a
27
previously-planned vacation of eBay’s counsel, while the Case Management Conference overlaps
28
with a previously-planned vacation of Exterro’s counsel. Accordingly, the parties request that the
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN JOSE
PALO ALTO
BURBANK
692\1235893.2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE ADR PHONE CONFERENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
5:15-CV-01311-BLF
1
Court continue the ADR Phone Conference until July 7, 2015, or such other time as is convenient
2
for the Court. The parties further request that the Court continue the Case Management
3
Conference until July 16, 2015, or such other time as is convenient for the Court.1
4
Neither of the parties have previously requested time modifications in this case. The
5
Court, acting sua sponte, previously rescheduled the initial case management conference. See
6
Dkt. 20. The time modifications requested by this stipulation will not have any effect on the
7
schedule for this case, which has not yet been established.
8
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
9
10
Dated: June 19, 2015
HOPKINS & CARLEY
A Law Corporation
11
12
By: /s/ Christopher A. Hohn
Allonn E. Levy
Christopher A. Hohn
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EBAY INC.
13
14
15
Dated: June 19, 2015
THOITS LAW, a Professional Corporation
16
17
By: /s/ Jared M. Ahern
18
Andrew P. Holland
Mark V. Boennighausen
Jared M. Ahern
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff EXTERRO, INC.
19
20
21
22
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: __ _________, 2015
Honorable Beth Labson Freeman
25
26
27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN JOSE
PALO ALTO
BURBANK
1
Counsel for eBay has a hearing scheduled in another matter that would prevent him from
attending a case management conference at 1:30 p.m. on July 9, 2015.
692\1235893.2
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE ADR PHONE CONFERENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
5:15-CV-01311-BLF
1
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 5-1(i)
2
3
4
I, Christopher A. Hohn, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file
the STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i), I
hereby attest that Jared M. Ahern of Thoits Law has concurred in this filing.
5
6
7
/s/ Christopher A. Hohn
Christopher A. Hohn
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN JOSE
PALO ALTO
BURBANK
-1692\1235893.2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE ADR PHONE CONFERENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?