Rios v. Frauenheim
Filing
47
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Granting 46 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Traverse due by 11/20/2020. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
ULYSSES ALEXANDER RIOS,
Petitioner,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 15-01357 BLF (PR)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
TRAVERSE
v.
S. FRAUENHEIM, Warden,
Respondent.
16
(Docket No. 46)
17
18
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a writ of habeas corpus pursuant
19
to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254, challenging his state conviction out of Santa Clara County. The stay
20
in the matter was lifted, and the matter reopened on March 6, 2020. Dkt. No. 39.
21
Respondent filed an answer on the merits on June 15, 2020. Dkt. No. 44. Because it
22
appeared that there was a clerical error in the mail that was sent to Petitioner, the Clerk of
23
the Court resent copies of the last court orders to Petitioner at his correct address on
24
September 1, 2020. Dkt. No. 45. Petitioner has now filed a motion for an extension of
25
time to file a traverse, citing extremely limited access to the law library due to COVID-19.
26
Dkt. No. 46. Good cause appearing, the motion is GRANTED. Petitioner shall file a
27
traverse no later than forty-five (45) days from the date this order is filed.
28
1
1
2
This order terminates Docket No. 46.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
DATED:
October 7, 2020
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Order Granting Mot. for EOT to file Traverse
P:\PRO-SE\BLF\HC.15\01357Rios_eot-trav.docx
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?