Rios v. Frauenheim

Filing 47

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Granting 46 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Traverse due by 11/20/2020. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 ULYSSES ALEXANDER RIOS, Petitioner, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 15-01357 BLF (PR) ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE v. S. FRAUENHEIM, Warden, Respondent. 16 (Docket No. 46) 17 18 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a writ of habeas corpus pursuant 19 to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254, challenging his state conviction out of Santa Clara County. The stay 20 in the matter was lifted, and the matter reopened on March 6, 2020. Dkt. No. 39. 21 Respondent filed an answer on the merits on June 15, 2020. Dkt. No. 44. Because it 22 appeared that there was a clerical error in the mail that was sent to Petitioner, the Clerk of 23 the Court resent copies of the last court orders to Petitioner at his correct address on 24 September 1, 2020. Dkt. No. 45. Petitioner has now filed a motion for an extension of 25 time to file a traverse, citing extremely limited access to the law library due to COVID-19. 26 Dkt. No. 46. Good cause appearing, the motion is GRANTED. Petitioner shall file a 27 traverse no later than forty-five (45) days from the date this order is filed. 28 1 1 2 This order terminates Docket No. 46. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: October 7, 2020 BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Order Granting Mot. for EOT to file Traverse P:\PRO-SE\BLF\HC.15\01357Rios_eot-trav.docx 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?