BladeRoom Group Limited et al v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 251

Order re 245 Facebook's Request for Reissuance of Amended Letters Rogatory. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/17/2017. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 BLADEROOM GROUP LIMITED, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 Case No.5:15-cv-01370-EJD (HRL) v. FACEBOOK, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER RE FACEBOOK’S REQUEST FOR REISSUANCE OF AMENDED LETTERS ROGATORY Re: Dkt. No. 245 17 18 Facebook requests that this court re-issue amended letters rogatory as to 4 witnesses in 19 England. Having reviewed the request, this court is prepared to grant Facebook’s request, but 20 notes the following: 21 1. Section VII.A. of each letter states that written evidence and documents are to be sent 22 to this court. The court has modified this section in each letter to show the court’s full 23 street address. 24 2. Each letter references several exhibits, but Facebook has not provided copies of those 25 exhibits to this court. Nor has Facebook clearly identified (i.e., by docket number) 26 what documents it has in mind, and this court is not going to guess. To the extent 27 Facebook wants the letters to be sent along with the referenced exhibits, it shall provide 28 those exhibits to the court forthwith. 1 3. With respect to the redacted versions of the Vaney and Batchelor letters, this court 2 assumes that Facebook does not want those versions to be sent to England, since 3 Facebook does not specifically say so. Accordingly, this court will sign and file the 4 redacted versions as requested, but will not forward them to the court in England. 5 SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: April 17, 2017 7 8 HOWARD R. LLOYD United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 5:15-cv-01370-EJD Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Anthony David Giles 3 Arjun Sivakumar 4 Elizabeth Lee Stameshkin 5 Erik Christopher Olson 6 Eugene Y. Mar anthony@anthonygiles.com asivakumar@brownrudnick.com lstameshkin@cooley.com eolson@fbm.com, calendar@fbm.com, shunt@fbm.com emar@fbm.com, calendar@fbm.com, mclaros@fbm.com 7 Heidi Lyn Keefe hkeefe@cooley.com, jmcintosh@cooley.com 8 9 10 James Alexander Reese areese@fbm.com Jeffrey M. Fisher jfisher@fbm.com, calendar@fbm.com, renterig@fbm.com, wpemail@fbm.com United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Julia Frederika Kropp jkropp@fbm.com, bwestburg@fbm.com, calendar@fbm.com Kristine Anne Forderer 14 Mark Frederick Lambert 15 Mark R. Weinstein 16 Matthew David Caplan 17 kforderer@cooley.com, rcahill@cooley.com, swarren@cooley.com mlambert@cooley.com, lalmanza@cooley.com mweinstein@cooley.com, patricia.russell@cooley.com mcaplan@cooley.com, smartinez@cooley.com 18 Melinda Mae Morton mindy.morton@procopio.com, calendaring@procopio.com, gail.poulos@procopio.com 19 Michael Graham Rhodes 20 21 Robert H. Sloss robert.sloss@procopio.com, calendaring@procopio.com, gail.poulos@procopio.com 22 Robert Thomas Cahill , Jr 23 Stephanie Powers Skaff rhodesmg@cooley.com, lopezre@cooley.com, moyespe@cooley.com rcahill@cooley.com sskaff@fbm.com, bwestburg@fbm.com, calendar@fbm.com 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?