BladeRoom Group Limited et al v. Facebook, Inc.
Filing
251
Order re 245 Facebook's Request for Reissuance of Amended Letters Rogatory. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/17/2017. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
BLADEROOM GROUP LIMITED, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
Case No.5:15-cv-01370-EJD (HRL)
v.
FACEBOOK, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER RE FACEBOOK’S REQUEST
FOR REISSUANCE OF AMENDED
LETTERS ROGATORY
Re: Dkt. No. 245
17
18
Facebook requests that this court re-issue amended letters rogatory as to 4 witnesses in
19
England. Having reviewed the request, this court is prepared to grant Facebook’s request, but
20
notes the following:
21
1. Section VII.A. of each letter states that written evidence and documents are to be sent
22
to this court. The court has modified this section in each letter to show the court’s full
23
street address.
24
2. Each letter references several exhibits, but Facebook has not provided copies of those
25
exhibits to this court. Nor has Facebook clearly identified (i.e., by docket number)
26
what documents it has in mind, and this court is not going to guess. To the extent
27
Facebook wants the letters to be sent along with the referenced exhibits, it shall provide
28
those exhibits to the court forthwith.
1
3. With respect to the redacted versions of the Vaney and Batchelor letters, this court
2
assumes that Facebook does not want those versions to be sent to England, since
3
Facebook does not specifically say so. Accordingly, this court will sign and file the
4
redacted versions as requested, but will not forward them to the court in England.
5
SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: April 17, 2017
7
8
HOWARD R. LLOYD
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
5:15-cv-01370-EJD Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Anthony David Giles
3
Arjun Sivakumar
4
Elizabeth Lee Stameshkin
5
Erik Christopher Olson
6
Eugene Y. Mar
anthony@anthonygiles.com
asivakumar@brownrudnick.com
lstameshkin@cooley.com
eolson@fbm.com, calendar@fbm.com, shunt@fbm.com
emar@fbm.com, calendar@fbm.com, mclaros@fbm.com
7
Heidi Lyn Keefe
hkeefe@cooley.com, jmcintosh@cooley.com
8
9
10
James Alexander Reese
areese@fbm.com
Jeffrey M. Fisher jfisher@fbm.com, calendar@fbm.com, renterig@fbm.com,
wpemail@fbm.com
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Julia Frederika Kropp
jkropp@fbm.com, bwestburg@fbm.com, calendar@fbm.com
Kristine Anne Forderer
14
Mark Frederick Lambert
15
Mark R. Weinstein
16
Matthew David Caplan
17
kforderer@cooley.com, rcahill@cooley.com, swarren@cooley.com
mlambert@cooley.com, lalmanza@cooley.com
mweinstein@cooley.com, patricia.russell@cooley.com
mcaplan@cooley.com, smartinez@cooley.com
18
Melinda Mae Morton mindy.morton@procopio.com, calendaring@procopio.com,
gail.poulos@procopio.com
19
Michael Graham Rhodes
20
21
Robert H. Sloss robert.sloss@procopio.com, calendaring@procopio.com,
gail.poulos@procopio.com
22
Robert Thomas Cahill , Jr
23
Stephanie Powers Skaff
rhodesmg@cooley.com, lopezre@cooley.com, moyespe@cooley.com
rcahill@cooley.com
sskaff@fbm.com, bwestburg@fbm.com, calendar@fbm.com
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?