Crawford v. Graham Holdings Company Long Term Disability Plan, FKA The Washington Post Company Long Term Disability Plan et al
ORDER RE 40 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/13/2015. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2015)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case No. 15-cv-01477-BLF
ORDER RE NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
GRAHAM HOLDINGS COMPANY LONG
TERM DISABILITY PLAN, et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
[Re: ECF 40]
Plaintiff has filed what purports to be a Notice of Dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF 40. The Notice does not include a stipulation and is
signed solely by Plaintiff’s counsel. Id.
A plaintiff may dismiss an action by filing a notice of dismissal “before the opposing party
serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(i).
Defendants in this case filed an answer on May 29, 2015. ECF 19. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s notice
Alternatively, the plaintiff may dismiss a case by filing “a stipulation of dismissal signed
by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii). If the parties wish to dismiss the
case, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties.
Furthermore, the Court notes that the caption in Plaintiff’s Notice of Dismissal names the incorrect
defendants. To be valid, any future stipulation of dismissal must name the correct defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 13, 2015
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?