Rowe v. Michaels Stores, Inc.
Filing
71
PRETRIAL ORDER(JURY): The Trial Setting Conference scheduled for 11/2/2017 is VACATED - NO APPEARANCE NECESSARY and the parties are ordered to comply with the schedule set forth in the Order. Due to hearing VACATED Motion terminated as MOOT: re [7 0] Motion to Appear by Telephone filed by Michaels Stores, Inc. Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification Hearing set for 2/8/2018 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Judge Edward J. Davila. Joint Final Pretrial Conference State ment due by 5/3/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/17/2018 11:00 AM. Jury Selection set for 6/5/2018 09:00 AM, Jury Trial set for 6/5/2018 01:30 PM. Jury Trial dates:6/8,6/12,6/13,6/15,6/18 & 6/19/2018 (deliberations). Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/25/2017. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
LAUREL ROWE,
8
Case No. 5:15-cv-01592-EJD
Plaintiff,
9
PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY)
v.
10
MICHAELS STORES, INC.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendant.
12
The above-entitled action is scheduled for a Trial Setting Conference on November 2,
13
14
2017. Based on the parties’ Joint Trial Setting Conference Statement, the court has determined an
15
appearance is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the Trial Setting Conference is VACATED
16
and the parties are ordered to comply with the following schedule.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following schedule shall apply to this case:
17
18
EVENT
DATE
19
Final Pretrial Conference
11:00 a.m. on May 17, 2018
20
Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement, Motions in Limine
and Exchange of Exhibits
May 3, 2018
22
Voir Dire Questions, Proposed Jury Instructions, and
Proposed Jury Verdict Forms
May 23, 2018
23
Trial Exhibits
May 25, 2018
Jury Selection
9:00 a.m. on June 5, 2018
Jury Trial1
June 5, 6, 8, 12, 13, and 15, 2018
21
24
25
26
27
1
28
Jury trials will are held in full day sessions on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Fridays, unless the
Court specifies otherwise. On the date set for jury selection, counsel should be prepared to
1
Jury Deliberations
June 18, 19, 2018
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with the Standing Order for
3
4
5
Civil Cases, a copy of which is available from the Clerk of the Court,2 with regard to all pretrial
submissions.
The court advises the parties that this is the final case schedule. All parties are expected
6
7
8
to comply as directed above. This schedule will not be amended further absent the presentation of
good cause necessitating such an amendment.
If Plaintiff intends to file a motion for class certification, Plaintiff shall file and serve her
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
motion in accordance with the Local Rules and notice the motion for hearing on February 8, 2018
at 9:00 a.m.
Finally, the Standing Order for Civil Cases, paragraph IV.A.1. limits each party to one
12
13
14
15
motion for summary judgment, partial summary judgment or summary adjudication. Therefore,
Defendant is advised that the Court will not hear any additional dispositive motions absent a
compelling showing of good cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
Dated: October 25, 2017
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
commence trial proceedings immediately after a jury is identified. The final trial schedule will be
confirmed at the Final Pretrial Conference.
2
A copy of Judge Davila’s standing order is also available on the court’s website at
www.cand.uscourts.gov by clicking first on the “Judges” button, then on Judge Davila’s name,
then on the link for “Judge Davila’s Standing Orders,” and finally on the link for “Standing Order
for Civil Cases.”
2
Case No.: 5:15-cv-01592-EJD
PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?