NEAS LIMITED v. OJSC RUSNANO et al

Filing 45

ORDER GRANTING re 44 Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint filed by Rusnano USA, Inc. Response due 10/30/2015. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 10/27/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

STEVEN M. SCHATZ, State Bar No. 118356
Email: [e-mail]
RODNEY G. STRICKLAND, JR., State Bar No. 161934
Email: [e-mail]
SHERYL SHAPIRO BASSIN, admitted pro hac vice
Email: [e-mail]
NAIRA DER KIUREGHIAN, State Bar No. 282391
Email: [e-mail]
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant

Rusnano USA, Inc.

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN JOSE DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

NEAS LIMITED, individually in its own right
and derivatively on behalf of NITOL SOLAR
LIMITED; and ANDREY TRETYAKOV,
v.

Plaintiffs,

OJSC RUSNANO; RUSNANO
MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC;
RUSNANO CAPITAL, A.G.; RUSNANO
CAPITAL, LLC; RUSNANO USA, INC.;
FONDS RUSNANO CAPITAL, A.G.;
ANATOLY CHUBAIS; OLEG KISELEV;
IRINA RAPPAPORT; SERGEY
POLIKARPOV; VALERY ROSTOKIN;
SHERIGO RESOURCES LIMITED; and
JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10,

Case No. 5:15-cv-01612-RMW
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
([PROPOSED] ORDER FILED
CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH)

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION RE RESPONSE TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Neas Limited, individually in its own right and derivatively on

2

behalf of Nitol Solar Limited, and Andrey Tretyakov commenced this action by filing a complaint

3

(the “Complaint”) on April 8, 2015;

4

WHEREAS, defendants Rusnano USA, Inc. (“Rusnano USA”); OJSC Rusnano; Rusnano

5

Management Company, LLC; Rusnano Capital, A.G.; Rusnano Capital, LLC; Fonds Rusnano

6

Capital, S.A.; Anatoly Chubais; Oleg Kiselev; Irina Rapoport; Sergey Polikarpov; and Valery

7

Rostokin (collectively, the “Moving Defendants”) filed motions to dismiss the Complaint on

8

September 11, 2015;

9

WHEREAS, rather than oppose the motions to dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

10

Procedure 15(a) Plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint (the “First Amended Complaint”) on

11

October 9, 2015;

12
13
14

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed to a short extension of the Moving Defendants’ time to
respond to the First Amended Complaint;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, as

15

follows: the Moving Defendants’ time to respond to the First Amended Complaint is extended to

16

and including October 30, 2015.

17
18

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: October 23, 2015

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

By: /s/ Karen Johnson-McKewan
Karen Johnson-McKewan
Robert L. Sills
Olga N. Sirodoeva
Attorneys for Defendants OJSC Rusnano;
Rusnano Management Company, LLC; Rusnano
Capital, A.G.; Rusnano Capital, LLC; Fonds
Rusnano Capital, S.A.; Anatoly Chubais; Oleg
Kiselev; Irina Rapoport; Sergey Polikarpov; and
Valery Rostokin

26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION RE RESPONSE TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

DATED: October 23, 2015

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC

2
By: /s/ Rodney Grant Strickland, Jr.
Rodney Grant Strickland, Jr.
Attorneys for Defendant Rusnano USA, Inc.

3
4
5

DATED: October 23, 2015

FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP

6
By: /s/ Ely Goldin
Ely Goldin
W. Christain Moffitt
Michael A. Sweet
Jack Praetzellis
Attorneys for Plaintiffs NEAS Limited,
individually and in its own right and derivatively
on behalf of Nitol Solar Limited, and Andrey
Tretyakov

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,

14
15

Dated: October 27, 2015
Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
Judge, U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

JOINT STIPULATION RE RESPONSE TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1

2
3

I, Rodney G. Strickland, Jr., am the ECF User whose identification and password are

4

being used to file this document. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that all

5

signatories have concurred in this filing.

6

DATED: October 23, 2015

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC

7
8
9

By: /s/ Rodney G. Strickland, Jr.
Rodney G. Strickland, Jr.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3JOINT STIPULATION RE RESPONSE TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT