Estate of Robert Renzel, Deceased et al v. Ventura et al
Filing
102
ORDER Granting re 100 Defendants Request to Appear Telephonically at Case Management Conference. Counsel is instructed to contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/10/2016. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jeffery L. Caufield (SBN 166524)
jeff@caufieldjames.com
Santino M. Tropea (SBN 249215)
santino@caufieldjames.com
CAUFIELD & JAMES, LLP
2851 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 410
San Diego, California 92108
Telephone: 619-325-0441
Facsimile: 619-325-0231
Attorneys for Defendants, Counter-Claimants,
and Cross-Claimants, Alfredo Torres and
Carmen Torres
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
ESTATE OF ROBERT RENZEL,
DECEASED, by and through his
successors in interest, Susan Carter and
Ann Renzel Sebastian, et al.
Case No.: 5:15-cv-01648-NC
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST TO
APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
v.
LUPE VENTURA, an individual and dba
Ritz Cleaners, et al.
Hearing Date:
Hearing Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
June 17, 2016
10:30 a.m.
6 – 4th Floor
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
Action Filed: April 10, 2015
Trial Date:
None set
Defendants.
18
19
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
AND CROSS-CLAIMS.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
1
Defendants Alfredo Torres and Carmen Torres’ request for their counsel to appear by
2
telephone at the Case Management Conference hearing, scheduled for June 17, 2016 at 10:30
3
a.m. in Courtroom 6 of the San Jose Division of the Northern District, is hereby GRANTED.
4
Counsel is instructed to contact CourtCall directly at (866) 582-6878 for telephonic appearance.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED:
6
7
6/10
DATED: _________, 2016
HON. RONALD M. WHYTE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
Case No. 15-CV-01648-NC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?