Estate of Robert Renzel, Deceased et al v. Ventura et al

Filing 88

ORDER Granting 87 Request to Appear Telephonically at Case Management Conference filed by Defendants' Carmen Torres, Alfredo Torres. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/7/2016. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jeffery L. Caufield (SBN 166524) jeff@caufieldjames.com Santino M. Tropea (SBN 249215) santino@caufieldjames.com CAUFIELD & JAMES, LLP 2851 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 410 San Diego, California 92108 Telephone: 619-325-0441 Facsimile: 619-325-0231 Attorneys for Defendants, Counter-Claimants, and Cross-Claimants, Alfredo Torres and Carmen Torres 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ESTATE OF ROBERT RENZEL, DECEASED, by and through his successors in interest, Susan Carter and Ann Renzel Sebastian, et al. Case No.: 5:15-cv-01648-RMW MODIFIED [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 v. LUPE VENTURA, an individual and dba Ritz Cleaners, et al. Hearing Date: Hearing Time: Courtroom: Judge: April 15, 2016 10:30 a.m. 6 – 4th Floor Hon. Ronald M. Whyte Action Filed: April 10, 2015 Trial Date: None set Defendants. 18 19 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS AND CROSS-CLAIMS. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE 1 Defendants Alfredo Torres and Carmen Torres’ request for their counsel to appear by 2 telephone at the Case Management Conference hearing, scheduled for April 15, 2016 at 10:30 3 a.m. in Courtroom 6 of the San Jose Division of the Northern District, is hereby GRANTED. 4 Counsel is instructed to contact CourtCall directly at (866) 582-6878 for telephonic appearance. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED: 6 7 4/7 DATED: _________, 2016 HON. RONALD M. WHYTE U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE Case No. 15-CV-01648-RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?