Che v. Liu Investments, LLC
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING 29 JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/4/2016. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2016)
1 ASCENSION LAW GROUP
Pamela Tsao, Cal Bar No. 266734
th
2 2030 E. 4 Street
Suite 205
3 Santa Ana, California 92705
Telephone: 714.783.4220
888.505.1033
Pamela.Tsao@ascensionlawgroup.com
4 Facsmile:
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
6 NGOC LAM CHE
7 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
8
9
10
11
12
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
GREGORY F. HURLEY, Cal. Bar No. 126791
ghurley@sheppardmullin.com
BRADLEY J. LEIMKUHLER, Cal. Bar No. 261024
bleimkuhler@sheppardmullin.com
650 Town Center Drive, 4th Floor
Costa Mesa, California 92626-1993
Telephone: 714.513.5100
Facsimile: 714.513.5130
13 Attorneys for Defendant,
LIU INVESTMENTS, LLC,
14 a limited liability company
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
18
NGOC LAM CHE, an individual,
19
Plaintiff,
20
21
v.
LIU INVESTMENTS, LLC., a limited
22 liability company; and DOES 1 through
Case No. 5:15-cv-01752-HRL
Magistrate Judge Howard L. Lloyd
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
JOINT STIPULATION FOR
DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
10, ,
23
24
Defendants.
Action Filed: April 17, 2015
None Set
Trial Date:
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:15-cv-01752-HRL
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
2
The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal pursuant to
3
4 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) jointly filed by the Parties, finds that
5 this action shall be dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own fees and
6 costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
February 4
9 DATED: __________, 2016
10
11
Honorable Beth Labson Freeman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:15-cv-01752-HRL
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION
PROO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?