Che v. Liu Investments, LLC

Filing 30

ORDER GRANTING 29 JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/4/2016. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2016)

Download PDF
1 ASCENSION LAW GROUP Pamela Tsao, Cal Bar No. 266734 th 2 2030 E. 4 Street Suite 205 3 Santa Ana, California 92705 Telephone: 714.783.4220 888.505.1033 Pamela.Tsao@ascensionlawgroup.com 4 Facsmile: 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff, 6 NGOC LAM CHE 7 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 8 9 10 11 12 A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations GREGORY F. HURLEY, Cal. Bar No. 126791 ghurley@sheppardmullin.com BRADLEY J. LEIMKUHLER, Cal. Bar No. 261024 bleimkuhler@sheppardmullin.com 650 Town Center Drive, 4th Floor Costa Mesa, California 92626-1993 Telephone: 714.513.5100 Facsimile: 714.513.5130 13 Attorneys for Defendant, LIU INVESTMENTS, LLC, 14 a limited liability company 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 17 18 NGOC LAM CHE, an individual, 19 Plaintiff, 20 21 v. LIU INVESTMENTS, LLC., a limited 22 liability company; and DOES 1 through Case No. 5:15-cv-01752-HRL Magistrate Judge Howard L. Lloyd [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 10, , 23 24 Defendants. Action Filed: April 17, 2015 None Set Trial Date: 25 26 27 28 Case No. 5:15-cv-01752-HRL 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 2 The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal pursuant to 3 4 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) jointly filed by the Parties, finds that 5 this action shall be dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own fees and 6 costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 February 4 9 DATED: __________, 2016 10 11 Honorable Beth Labson Freeman UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 5:15-cv-01752-HRL -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION PROO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?