Myers v. Blue Cross of California et al
Filing
9
REFERRAL ORDER (MYERS). Signed by Judge Hon. Lucy H. Koh on 7/2/2015. **The parties must file a response in opposition to or in support of relating the case pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12(e).** (sms, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
SANDY MYERS,
13
14
15
Case No. 5:15-CV-01766-LHK
REFERRAL ORDER (MYERS)
Plaintiff,
v.
17
BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA (D/B/A/
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS), a California
corporation, and ANTHEM, Inc., an Indiana
corporation,
18
Defendants.
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
This case, Myers v. Blue Cross of California, et al., No. 5:15-CV-01766-LHK (“Myers”),
was filed on April 20, 2015. ECF No. 1. On May 7, 2015, Myers was reassigned to the
Honorable Lucy H. Koh. ECF No. 6. The Court is prepared to relate Myers to In re Anthem, Inc.
Data Breach Litigation, No. 5:15-MD-02617-LHK (“Anthem MDL”), pursuant to Civil L.R. 312(c). The parties must file a response in opposition to or in support of relating the case pursuant
to Civil L.R. 3-12(e).
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 5:15-CV-01027-LHK
REFERRAL ORDER (MYERS)
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Dated: July 2, 2015
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 5:15-CV-01027-LHK
REFERRAL ORDER (MYERS)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?