Myers v. Blue Cross of California et al

Filing 9

REFERRAL ORDER (MYERS). Signed by Judge Hon. Lucy H. Koh on 7/2/2015. **The parties must file a response in opposition to or in support of relating the case pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12(e).** (sms, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 SANDY MYERS, 13 14 15 Case No. 5:15-CV-01766-LHK REFERRAL ORDER (MYERS) Plaintiff, v. 17 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA (D/B/A/ ANTHEM BLUE CROSS), a California corporation, and ANTHEM, Inc., an Indiana corporation, 18 Defendants. 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 This case, Myers v. Blue Cross of California, et al., No. 5:15-CV-01766-LHK (“Myers”), was filed on April 20, 2015. ECF No. 1. On May 7, 2015, Myers was reassigned to the Honorable Lucy H. Koh. ECF No. 6. The Court is prepared to relate Myers to In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach Litigation, No. 5:15-MD-02617-LHK (“Anthem MDL”), pursuant to Civil L.R. 312(c). The parties must file a response in opposition to or in support of relating the case pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12(e). 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 5:15-CV-01027-LHK REFERRAL ORDER (MYERS) 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: July 2, 2015 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 5:15-CV-01027-LHK REFERRAL ORDER (MYERS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?