Diaz et al v. Intuit, Inc.

Filing 129

ORDER GRANTING 128 STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/7/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Michael W. Sobol (SBN 194857) msobol@lchb.com LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: 415.956.1000 Steven W. Teppler (pro hac vice) steppler@abbottlawpa.com ABBOTT LAW GROUP, P.A. 2929 Plummer Cove Road Jacksonville, FL 32223 Telephone: 904.292.1111 Attorneys for Defendant Intuit Inc. Joseph J. Siprut (pro hac vice) jsiprut@siprut.com SIPRUT PC 17 North State Street, Suite 1600 Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: 312.236.0000 Ariana J. Tadler (pro hac vice) atadler@milberg.com MILBERG, LLP One Pennsylvania Plaza, 49th Floor New York, NY 10119 Telephone: 212.946.9453 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 Rodger R. Cole (SBN 178865) rcole@fenwick.com Angel Chiang (SBN 280546) achiang@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: 650.988.8500 Facsimile: 650.938.5200 IN RE INTUIT DATA LITIGATION Case No. 15-CV-1778-EJD-SVK 22 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 23 ALL ACTIONS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CERTIFY ORDER FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL 21 24 Honorable Edward J. Davila 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL CASE NO.: 15-CV-1778-EJD-SVK 1 WHEREAS, on September 29, 2017, the Court entered an Order in this action granting 2 Defendant Intuit Inc.’s (“Intuit”) Motion To Compel Arbitration (Dkt. 123; “Arbitration Order”), 3 compelling four of the plaintiffs to arbitration; 4 WHEREAS, on October 27, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Certify Order for 5 Interlocutory Appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) or, in the alternative, for leave to file a Motion 6 for Reconsideration of the Court’s Arbitration Order pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(1) 7 (together, the “Motion for Leave to Appeal”); 8 9 10 11 12 13 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Appeal is currently scheduled to be heard by the Court on February 15, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.; WHEREAS, Intuit’s opposition to the Motion for Leave to Appeal is currently due November 13, 2017, and Plaintiffs’ reply is due by November 20, 2017; WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and have agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, to the following modified briefing schedule for filing their opposition and reply briefs: 14 Event 15 16 17 18 19 Proposed Date Deadline for Defendant to file Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Appeal December 1, 2017 Deadline for Plaintiffs to file reply in support of their Motion for Leave to Appeal December 22, 2017 20 21 22 23 WHEREAS, the requested modification will not affect any other deadlines previously set by the Court. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the 24 deadline for Defendant to file an opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Appeal be 25 continued from November 13, 2017 to December 1, 2017, and the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a 26 reply in support of their Motion be continued from November 20, 2017 to December 22, 2017. 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL 1 CASE NO.: 15-CV-1778-EJD-SVK 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 Dated: November 6, 2017 Respectfully Submitted, 3 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 4 By: /s/ Roger N. Heller 5 7 Michael W. Sobol Roger N. Heller Melissa A. Gardner 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 6 9 Dated: November 6, 2017 Respectfully Submitted, 10 FENWICK & WEST LLP 11 By: /s/ Rodger R. Cole Rodger R. Cole Angel Chiang 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant Intuit Inc. 14 15 16 17 18 ECF CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filing attorney attests that he has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the signatories to the document. 19 20 By: /s/ Rodger Cole Rodger R. Cole Dated: November 6, 2017 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL 2 CASE NO.: 15-CV-1778-EJD-SVK 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the undersigned hereby orders that the briefing 3 schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Order for Interlocutory Appeal be modified as follows: 4 Defendant shall file an opposition by December 1, 2017, and Plaintiffs shall file a reply by 5 December 22, 2017. 6 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED. Dated: November 7, 2017 8 Honorable Edward J. Davila United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL 3 CASE NO.: 15-CV-1778-EJD-SVK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?