Diaz et al v. Intuit, Inc.
Filing
129
ORDER GRANTING 128 STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/7/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Michael W. Sobol (SBN 194857)
msobol@lchb.com
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: 415.956.1000
Steven W. Teppler (pro hac vice)
steppler@abbottlawpa.com
ABBOTT LAW GROUP, P.A.
2929 Plummer Cove Road
Jacksonville, FL 32223
Telephone: 904.292.1111
Attorneys for Defendant Intuit Inc.
Joseph J. Siprut (pro hac vice)
jsiprut@siprut.com
SIPRUT PC
17 North State Street, Suite 1600
Chicago, IL 60602
Telephone: 312.236.0000
Ariana J. Tadler (pro hac vice)
atadler@milberg.com
MILBERG, LLP
One Pennsylvania Plaza, 49th Floor
New York, NY 10119
Telephone: 212.946.9453
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
Rodger R. Cole (SBN 178865)
rcole@fenwick.com
Angel Chiang (SBN 280546)
achiang@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
Telephone: 650.988.8500
Facsimile: 650.938.5200
IN RE INTUIT DATA LITIGATION
Case No. 15-CV-1778-EJD-SVK
22
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
23
ALL ACTIONS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CERTIFY
ORDER FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL
21
24
Honorable Edward J. Davila
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
CASE NO.: 15-CV-1778-EJD-SVK
1
WHEREAS, on September 29, 2017, the Court entered an Order in this action granting
2
Defendant Intuit Inc.’s (“Intuit”) Motion To Compel Arbitration (Dkt. 123; “Arbitration Order”),
3
compelling four of the plaintiffs to arbitration;
4
WHEREAS, on October 27, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Certify Order for
5
Interlocutory Appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) or, in the alternative, for leave to file a Motion
6
for Reconsideration of the Court’s Arbitration Order pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(1)
7
(together, the “Motion for Leave to Appeal”);
8
9
10
11
12
13
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Appeal is currently scheduled to be heard by
the Court on February 15, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.;
WHEREAS, Intuit’s opposition to the Motion for Leave to Appeal is currently due
November 13, 2017, and Plaintiffs’ reply is due by November 20, 2017;
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and have agreed, subject to the Court’s approval,
to the following modified briefing schedule for filing their opposition and reply briefs:
14
Event
15
16
17
18
19
Proposed Date
Deadline for Defendant to file Opposition to
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Appeal
December 1, 2017
Deadline for Plaintiffs to file reply in support
of their Motion for Leave to Appeal
December 22, 2017
20
21
22
23
WHEREAS, the requested modification will not affect any other deadlines previously set
by the Court.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the
24
deadline for Defendant to file an opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Appeal be
25
continued from November 13, 2017 to December 1, 2017, and the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a
26
reply in support of their Motion be continued from November 20, 2017 to December 22, 2017.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
1
CASE NO.: 15-CV-1778-EJD-SVK
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
Dated: November 6, 2017
Respectfully Submitted,
3
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
4
By: /s/ Roger N. Heller
5
7
Michael W. Sobol
Roger N. Heller
Melissa A. Gardner
8
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
6
9
Dated: November 6, 2017
Respectfully Submitted,
10
FENWICK & WEST LLP
11
By: /s/ Rodger R. Cole
Rodger R. Cole
Angel Chiang
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant Intuit Inc.
14
15
16
17
18
ECF CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filing attorney attests that he has obtained
concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the signatories to the document.
19
20
By: /s/ Rodger Cole
Rodger R. Cole
Dated: November 6, 2017
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
2
CASE NO.: 15-CV-1778-EJD-SVK
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the undersigned hereby orders that the briefing
3
schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Order for Interlocutory Appeal be modified as follows:
4
Defendant shall file an opposition by December 1, 2017, and Plaintiffs shall file a reply by
5
December 22, 2017.
6
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED.
Dated: November 7, 2017
8
Honorable Edward J. Davila
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
3
CASE NO.: 15-CV-1778-EJD-SVK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?