Robert Heath v. Google Inc.
Filing
90
ORDER GRANTING 89 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OPPOSITION BRIEF. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/22/2016. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Thomas M. McInerney, CA Bar No. 162055
tmm@ogletreedeakins.com
Brian D. Berry, CA Bar No. 229893
brian.berry@ogletreedeakins.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870
Daniel L. Low, CA Bar No. 218387
dlow@kotchen.com
KOTCHEN & LOW LLP
1745 Kalorama Road NW, Suite 101
Washington, D.C. 20009
Telephone:
202.841.7164
Facsimile:
202.280.1128
A. Craig Cleland, pro hac vice
craig.cleland@ogletreedeakins.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
191 Peachtree St., NE., Ste. 4800
Atlanta, GA 30303
Telephone:
404.881.1300
Facsimile:
404.870.1732
Dow W. Patten
dow@smithpatten.com
SMITH PATTEN
221 Main St., Suite 740
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.402.0084
Facsimile:
415.520.0104
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CHERYL FILLEKES
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT HEATH
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
ROBERT HEATH, and
CHERYL FILLEKES,
Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and others
similarly situated,
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
ENLARGEMENT OF DEFENDANT
GOOGLE INC.’S OPPOSITION BRIEF
Plaintiff,
19
20
Case No. 15-cv-01824-BLF
Date:
September 22, 2016
Time:
9:00 a.m.
Location: Courtroom 3, 5th Floor
v.
21
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation,
22
Defendant.
Complaint Filed: April 22, 2015
Trial Date:
June 5, 2017
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 15-cv-01824-BLF
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S OPPOSITION BRIEF
1
Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12 of the Northern District of California, Defendant
2
Google, Inc. (“Google”) and Plaintiffs Robert Heath and Cheryl Fillekes (“Plaintiffs”) respectfully
3
stipulate as follows:
4
5
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Fillekes filed a Motion For Conditional Certification of Collective
Action on June 29, 2016 (ECF 75);
6
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Heath filed a Partial Joinder in Fillekes’ motion on July 1, 2016;
7
WHEREAS, Google’s deadline to file its opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion and joinder is July
8
29, 2016;
9
WHEREAS, counsel for Google has represented to counsel for Plaintiffs Heath and Fillekes
10
that Google will respond to Fillekes’ motion and Heath’s partial joinder in a combined opposition
11
brief, and that it may need 10 additional pages to fully do so; and
12
13
14
15
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Fillekes and Heath do not oppose Google’s request to file an
opposition brief not to exceed 35 pages.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate
and agree as follows:
16
Google may file a brief not to exceed 35 pages in combined opposition to Plaintiff Fillekes’
17
Motion For Conditional Certification of Collective Action (ECF 75) and Plaintiff Heath’s Partial
18
Joinder (ECF 78).
19
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THORUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
20
21
DATED: July 22, 2016
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
22
23
24
25
26
By:
/s/ Brian D. Berry
Thomas M. McInerney
A. Craig Cleland
Brian D. Berry
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.
27
28
1
Case No. 15-cv-01824-BLF
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S OPPOSITION BRIEF
1
DATED: July 22, 2016
2
KOTCHEN & LOW LLP
By:
3
/s/
Daniel L. Low
Attorney for Plaintiffs
CHERYL FILLEKES
4
5
6
7
DATED: July 22, 2016
8
SMITH PATTEN
By:
9
/s/
Dow W. Patten
Attorney for Plaintiffs
ROBERT HEATH
10
11
12
13
14
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
15
documents has been obtained from the other signatories.
16
17
18
19
DATED: July 22, 2016
By:
/s/ Brian D. Berry
Brian D. Berry
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 15-cv-01824-BLF
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S OPPOSITION BRIEF
1
ORDER
2
As stipulated and agreed to by the Parties, Google may file a memorandum of points in
3
authorities not to exceed 35 pages in combined opposition to Plaintiff Fillekes’ Motion for
4
Conditional Certification of Collective Action (ECF 75) and Plaintiff Heath’s Partial Joinder (ECF
5
78).
6
7
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
July 22, 2016
DATED: _____________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
25569628.1
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 15-cv-01824-BLF
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S OPPOSITION BRIEF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?