Robert Heath v. Google Inc.

Filing 90

ORDER GRANTING 89 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OPPOSITION BRIEF. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/22/2016. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Thomas M. McInerney, CA Bar No. 162055 tmm@ogletreedeakins.com Brian D. Berry, CA Bar No. 229893 brian.berry@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.442.4810 Facsimile: 415.442.4870 Daniel L. Low, CA Bar No. 218387 dlow@kotchen.com KOTCHEN & LOW LLP 1745 Kalorama Road NW, Suite 101 Washington, D.C. 20009 Telephone: 202.841.7164 Facsimile: 202.280.1128 A. Craig Cleland, pro hac vice craig.cleland@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 191 Peachtree St., NE., Ste. 4800 Atlanta, GA 30303 Telephone: 404.881.1300 Facsimile: 404.870.1732 Dow W. Patten dow@smithpatten.com SMITH PATTEN 221 Main St., Suite 740 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.402.0084 Facsimile: 415.520.0104 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff CHERYL FILLEKES Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT HEATH Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 ROBERT HEATH, and CHERYL FILLEKES, Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S OPPOSITION BRIEF Plaintiff, 19 20 Case No. 15-cv-01824-BLF Date: September 22, 2016 Time: 9:00 a.m. Location: Courtroom 3, 5th Floor v. 21 GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, 22 Defendant. Complaint Filed: April 22, 2015 Trial Date: June 5, 2017 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 15-cv-01824-BLF JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S OPPOSITION BRIEF 1 Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12 of the Northern District of California, Defendant 2 Google, Inc. (“Google”) and Plaintiffs Robert Heath and Cheryl Fillekes (“Plaintiffs”) respectfully 3 stipulate as follows: 4 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Fillekes filed a Motion For Conditional Certification of Collective Action on June 29, 2016 (ECF 75); 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Heath filed a Partial Joinder in Fillekes’ motion on July 1, 2016; 7 WHEREAS, Google’s deadline to file its opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion and joinder is July 8 29, 2016; 9 WHEREAS, counsel for Google has represented to counsel for Plaintiffs Heath and Fillekes 10 that Google will respond to Fillekes’ motion and Heath’s partial joinder in a combined opposition 11 brief, and that it may need 10 additional pages to fully do so; and 12 13 14 15 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Fillekes and Heath do not oppose Google’s request to file an opposition brief not to exceed 35 pages. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 16 Google may file a brief not to exceed 35 pages in combined opposition to Plaintiff Fillekes’ 17 Motion For Conditional Certification of Collective Action (ECF 75) and Plaintiff Heath’s Partial 18 Joinder (ECF 78). 19 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THORUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 20 21 DATED: July 22, 2016 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 22 23 24 25 26 By: /s/ Brian D. Berry Thomas M. McInerney A. Craig Cleland Brian D. Berry Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 27 28 1 Case No. 15-cv-01824-BLF JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S OPPOSITION BRIEF 1 DATED: July 22, 2016 2 KOTCHEN & LOW LLP By: 3 /s/ Daniel L. Low Attorney for Plaintiffs CHERYL FILLEKES 4 5 6 7 DATED: July 22, 2016 8 SMITH PATTEN By: 9 /s/ Dow W. Patten Attorney for Plaintiffs ROBERT HEATH 10 11 12 13 14 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this 15 documents has been obtained from the other signatories. 16 17 18 19 DATED: July 22, 2016 By: /s/ Brian D. Berry Brian D. Berry 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 15-cv-01824-BLF JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S OPPOSITION BRIEF 1 ORDER 2 As stipulated and agreed to by the Parties, Google may file a memorandum of points in 3 authorities not to exceed 35 pages in combined opposition to Plaintiff Fillekes’ Motion for 4 Conditional Certification of Collective Action (ECF 75) and Plaintiff Heath’s Partial Joinder (ECF 5 78). 6 7 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 July 22, 2016 DATED: _____________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 25569628.1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 15-cv-01824-BLF JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S OPPOSITION BRIEF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?