Littleton v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc et al
Filing
37
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. If Plaintiff does not, by August 28, 2015, demonstrate good case in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/20/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
RONNIE LITTLETON,
Case No. 5:15-cv-01836-EJD
Plaintiff,
9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION
ASSISTANCE AGENCY,
Defendant.
On August 4, 2015, the court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint with leave
14
to amend. See Docket Item No. 34. The court set a deadline of August 19, 2015, for the filing of
15
an amended complaint. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint as directed.
16
Accordingly, the court hereby issues an order to show cause why this action should not be
17
dismissed for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff does not, by August 28, 2015, demonstrate good
18
case in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the action with
19
prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order
20
to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court.
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 20, 2015
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 5:15-cv-01836-EJD
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?