Littleton v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc et al

Filing 37

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. If Plaintiff does not, by August 28, 2015, demonstrate good case in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/20/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 RONNIE LITTLETON, Case No. 5:15-cv-01836-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY, Defendant. On August 4, 2015, the court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint with leave 14 to amend. See Docket Item No. 34. The court set a deadline of August 19, 2015, for the filing of 15 an amended complaint. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint as directed. 16 Accordingly, the court hereby issues an order to show cause why this action should not be 17 dismissed for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff does not, by August 28, 2015, demonstrate good 18 case in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the action with 19 prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order 20 to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 20, 2015 ______________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 5:15-cv-01836-EJD ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?