First Financial Security, Inc. v. Freedom Equity Group, LLC

Filing 191

ORDER RE: MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT re 189 MOTION to Vacate 134 Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof filed by Freedom Equity Group, LLC. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/15/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 FIRST FINANCIAL SECURITY, INC., Plaintiff, 7 8 vs. 9 FREEDOM EQUITY GROUP, LLC, 10 ORDER RE: MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 189 Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California CASE NO. 5:15-CV-01893-HRL In light of Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd’s recent retirement, defendant Freedom 12 Equity Group, LLC’s (“FEG”) unopposed motion to vacate the judgment against it (Dkt. No. 189 13 (“Motion”)) has been assigned to the undersigned, serving as the General Duty Judge on the date 14 of filing. Having reviewed FEG’s motion, the Court ORDERS as follows, to be completed by no 15 later than June 29, 2018: 16 1. Given the undersigned’s unfamiliarity with the above-captioned action, FEG shall file 17 a supplemental brief providing the Court with the appropriate factual background 18 necessary for resolving FEG’s motion. 19 2. In light of Judge Lloyd’s retirement, FEG shall file an updated proposed order which 20 reflects that its motion is now before the undersigned. The proposed order must also 21 specify any other action the Court should take at this juncture given the procedural 22 posture of the case, including an indication as to the disposition of the case if the 23 judgment is vacated (i.e., whether it will be dismissed, and if so, when). FEG shall 24 submit an editable version of the same to ygrPO@cand.uscourts.gov. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: June 15, 2018 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?