Lynne Coates v. Farmers Group, Inc. et al
Filing
120
ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 3/15/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
LYNNE COATES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 15-CV-01913-LHK
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
FARMERS GROUP, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
The case management conference set for March 16, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. is hereby
19
CONTINUED to June 8, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file their joint case management
20
statement by June 1, 2016.
21
On March 9, 2016, the parties filed a joint case management statement with a proposed
22
case schedule. ECF No. 117. The parties proposed a fact discovery cut-off of October 14, 2016
23
and anticipated the case being ready for trial by April 24, 2017. Id. at 12.
24
On March 14, 2016, the Court proposed a case schedule and invited the parties to file any
25
objections to the proposal. ECF No. 118. The Court’s proposed schedule adopted the parties’
26
proposed fact discovery cut-off of October 14, 2016, but proposed a trial date of July 10, 2017 to
27
provide sufficient time for the parties to brief dispositive motions, the Court to rule on dispositive
28
1
Case No. 15-CV-01913-LHK
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
motions, and the parties to comply with the Court’s pretrial conference filing deadlines. The
2
Court also proposed April 20, 2017 as the hearing date for dispositive motions.
3
On March 15, 2016, Defendants Farmers Group, Inc., Farmers Insurance Exchange, and
4
Farmers Insurance Company, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed objections to the proposed
5
schedule. ECF No. 119. Defendants asked the Court to extend the fact discovery deadline from
6
October 14, 2016 to December 15, 2016. Defendants also extended the trial expert discovery
7
dates and the dispositive motion briefing schedule. Plaintiffs Lynne Coates, Serena Neves, Karen
8
Wasson, Keever Rhodes, and Celeste Stokes did not file any objections to the proposed case
9
schedule.
10
The Court adopts Defendants’ proposed fact and expert discovery extensions. However,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
the briefing schedule for dispositive motions remains as proposed by the Court. Accordingly, the
12
Court adopts the following case schedule:
13
Scheduled Event
Date
Opening Expert Reports
June 2, 2016
Further Case Management Conference
June 8, 2016, at 2:00 p.m.
16
Rebuttal Expert Reports
June 30, 2016
17
Close of Expert Discovery
July 21, 2016
18
Briefing Schedule on Motions for Class
Certification and/or Decertification
Motion: July 21, 2016
Opposition: August 18, 2016
Reply: September 8, 2016
Hearing on Motion for Class Certification
September 29, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.
Close of Fact Discovery
December 15, 2016
Opening Trial Expert Reports
January 9, 2017
Rebuttal Trial Expert Reports
January 24, 2017
Close of Trial Expert Discovery
January 27, 2017
Briefing Schedule on Dispositive Motions
Motion: February 23, 2017
Opposition: March 16, 2017
Reply: March 30, 2017
Briefing Schedule on Daubert Motions
Motion: March 9, 2017
Opposition: March 23, 2017
14
15
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 15-CV-01913-LHK
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Reply: March 30, 2017
1
Hearing on Dispositive and Daubert
Motions
April 20, 2017, at 1:30 p.m.
2
3
Final Pretrial Conference
June 29, 2017, at 1:30 p.m.
4
Jury Trial
July 10, 2017, at 9:00 a.m.
Length of Trial
9 days
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
10
Dated: March 15, 2016
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 15-CV-01913-LHK
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?