Lynne Coates v. Farmers Group, Inc. et al

Filing 120

ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 3/15/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 LYNNE COATES, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 Case No. 15-CV-01913-LHK ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. FARMERS GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. 17 18 The case management conference set for March 16, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. is hereby 19 CONTINUED to June 8, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file their joint case management 20 statement by June 1, 2016. 21 On March 9, 2016, the parties filed a joint case management statement with a proposed 22 case schedule. ECF No. 117. The parties proposed a fact discovery cut-off of October 14, 2016 23 and anticipated the case being ready for trial by April 24, 2017. Id. at 12. 24 On March 14, 2016, the Court proposed a case schedule and invited the parties to file any 25 objections to the proposal. ECF No. 118. The Court’s proposed schedule adopted the parties’ 26 proposed fact discovery cut-off of October 14, 2016, but proposed a trial date of July 10, 2017 to 27 provide sufficient time for the parties to brief dispositive motions, the Court to rule on dispositive 28 1 Case No. 15-CV-01913-LHK ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 motions, and the parties to comply with the Court’s pretrial conference filing deadlines. The 2 Court also proposed April 20, 2017 as the hearing date for dispositive motions. 3 On March 15, 2016, Defendants Farmers Group, Inc., Farmers Insurance Exchange, and 4 Farmers Insurance Company, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed objections to the proposed 5 schedule. ECF No. 119. Defendants asked the Court to extend the fact discovery deadline from 6 October 14, 2016 to December 15, 2016. Defendants also extended the trial expert discovery 7 dates and the dispositive motion briefing schedule. Plaintiffs Lynne Coates, Serena Neves, Karen 8 Wasson, Keever Rhodes, and Celeste Stokes did not file any objections to the proposed case 9 schedule. 10 The Court adopts Defendants’ proposed fact and expert discovery extensions. However, United States District Court Northern District of California 11 the briefing schedule for dispositive motions remains as proposed by the Court. Accordingly, the 12 Court adopts the following case schedule: 13 Scheduled Event Date Opening Expert Reports June 2, 2016 Further Case Management Conference June 8, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. 16 Rebuttal Expert Reports June 30, 2016 17 Close of Expert Discovery July 21, 2016 18 Briefing Schedule on Motions for Class Certification and/or Decertification Motion: July 21, 2016 Opposition: August 18, 2016 Reply: September 8, 2016 Hearing on Motion for Class Certification September 29, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. Close of Fact Discovery December 15, 2016 Opening Trial Expert Reports January 9, 2017 Rebuttal Trial Expert Reports January 24, 2017 Close of Trial Expert Discovery January 27, 2017 Briefing Schedule on Dispositive Motions Motion: February 23, 2017 Opposition: March 16, 2017 Reply: March 30, 2017 Briefing Schedule on Daubert Motions Motion: March 9, 2017 Opposition: March 23, 2017 14 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 15-CV-01913-LHK ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Reply: March 30, 2017 1 Hearing on Dispositive and Daubert Motions April 20, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. 2 3 Final Pretrial Conference June 29, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. 4 Jury Trial July 10, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. Length of Trial 9 days 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 10 Dated: March 15, 2016 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 15-CV-01913-LHK ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?