Montoya v. Comcast Corporation
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT 7 . Case Management Conference continued to 8/19/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose. Joint case management statement due 8/12/2015. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/29/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2015)
1 Mark S. Spring, State Bar No. 155114
mspring@cdflaborlaw.com
2 Teresa W. Ghali, State Bar No. 252961
tghali@cdflaborlaw.com
3 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP
900 University Avenue
4 Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
5 Telephone: (916) 361-0991
Facsimile: (916) 570-1958
6
Attorneys for Defendant
7 Comcast Corporation
8 Alan Adelman, State Bar No. 170860
alan@alanadelmanlaw.com
9 LAW OFFICES OF ALAN ADELMAN
240 Stockton Street, 4th Fllor
10 Union Square
San Francisco, CA 94108
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12 Davin Montoya
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN JOSE DIVISION
16 DAVIN MONTOYA,
Plaintiff,
17
vs.
18
COMCAST CORPORATION,
19
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:15-cv-02026-NC
Assigned for All Purposes To:
Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
ANSWER COMPLAINT; STIPULATED
REQUEST TO CONTINUE AUGUST 5,
2015 STATUS CONFERENCE TO
AUGUST 19, 2015; DECLARATION OF
TERESA W. GHALI; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
943498.1
Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-1 (a), Plaintiff Davin Montoya
1
2 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Comcast Corporation (“Defendant”), through their undersigned
3 counsel, hereby agree and stipulate that Defendant shall have an extension of time until July 10,
4 2015 to file its Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint, which was filed with this Court on May 5, 2015.
5 The parties have been engaged in negotiations to resolve this matter, but as these attempts were not
6 successful, the parties have now agreed that Defendant may respond to Plaintiff’s complaint on
7 July 10, 2015.
The parties also stipulate and consent to the jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge Nathanael
8
9 Cousins for all purposes in this case.
Additionally, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-2, the parties
10
11 stipulate and request an order rescheduling the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter,
12 currently scheduled for August 5, 2015, to August 19, 2015 (or in the alternative, August 12 or
13 August 26, 2015). The parties request this enlargement of time because Plaintiff’s counsel, Alan
14 Adelman, and lead defense counsel, Mark S. Spring, are unavailable to appear on August 5, 2015.
15 Mr. Adelman will be on a backpacking trip in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, and Mark S. Spring is
16 on a prepaid vacation the week of August 2 due to his sister’s wedding. Declaration of Teresa W.
17 Ghali ¶ 2. The stipulation to extend time to respond to the Complaint and stipulated request to
18 reschedule the Initial CMC are the first requests for time modification in this case; these extensions
19 will not affect the parties’ ability to proceed with this litigation in a timely fashion. Id.
20
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
21 Dated: June 26, 2015
CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP
22
24
By: /s/ Teresa W. Ghali
Teresa W. Ghali
Attorneys for Defendant
COMCAST CORPORATION
25 Dated: June 26, 2015
Law Offices of Alan Adelman
23
26
By: /s/ Alan Adelman
27
Alan Adelman
Attorney for Plaintiff
DAVIN MONTOYA
1
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
943498.1
1
DECLARATION OF TERESA W. GHALI
1.
2
I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all of the courts in the State
3 of California. I am an associate with the law firm of Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP
4 (“CDF”), counsel of record for Comcast Corporation (“Defendant” or “Comcast”) in this action. I
5 have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Declaration and, if called as a witness, could
6 and would testify competently to such facts under oath.
2.
7
The parties request that the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter,
8 currently scheduled for August 5, 2015, be moved to August 19, 2015, or in the alternative, August
9 12 or August 26, 2015. The parties seek this enlargement of time because Plaintiff’s counsel and
10 lead defense counsel, Mark S. Spring, are unavailable to appear on August 5, 2015. Mr. Adelman
11 has informed our firm that he will be on a backpacking trip in the Sierra Nevada Mountains during
12 that week. Mr. Spring is lead trial counsel and he has informed me that he is on vacation from late
13 July through August 8, in New York, as his sister is getting married during this time in New York.
3.
14
The stipulation to extend time to respond to the Complaint and stipulated request to
15 reschedule the Initial CMC are the first requests for time modification in this case; these extensions
16 will not affect the parties’ ability to proceed with this litigation in a timely fashion. Id.
4.
17
Per Northern District Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that I have obtained authorization
18 from Plaintiff’s counsel, Alan Adelman, to file this Stipulation on his behalf.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United
19
20 States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on this 26th day of June, 2015, at San Francisco, California.
21
22
/s/ Teresa W. Ghali
Teresa W. Ghali
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
943498.1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
3 The Initial Case Management Conference in this action shall take place on August __, 2015.
4 Joint case management statement due August 12, 2015.
UNIT
ED
NO
9
RT
10
.
thanael M
Judge Na
ER
12
A
H
11
Cousins
R NIA
8
Honorable TED
Nathanael Cousins
AN
GRMagistrate Judge
FO
7
LI
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
5
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
943498.1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?