Montoya v. Comcast Corporation

Filing 8

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT 7 . Case Management Conference continued to 8/19/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose. Joint case management statement due 8/12/2015. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/29/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2015)

Download PDF
1 Mark S. Spring, State Bar No. 155114 mspring@cdflaborlaw.com 2 Teresa W. Ghali, State Bar No. 252961 tghali@cdflaborlaw.com 3 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP 900 University Avenue 4 Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 5 Telephone: (916) 361-0991 Facsimile: (916) 570-1958 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 Comcast Corporation 8 Alan Adelman, State Bar No. 170860 alan@alanadelmanlaw.com 9 LAW OFFICES OF ALAN ADELMAN 240 Stockton Street, 4th Fllor 10 Union Square San Francisco, CA 94108 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 Davin Montoya 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN JOSE DIVISION 16 DAVIN MONTOYA, Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 COMCAST CORPORATION, 19 Defendant. 20 21 22 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:15-cv-02026-NC Assigned for All Purposes To: Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT; STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE AUGUST 5, 2015 STATUS CONFERENCE TO AUGUST 19, 2015; DECLARATION OF TERESA W. GHALI; [PROPOSED] ORDER 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 943498.1 Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-1 (a), Plaintiff Davin Montoya 1 2 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Comcast Corporation (“Defendant”), through their undersigned 3 counsel, hereby agree and stipulate that Defendant shall have an extension of time until July 10, 4 2015 to file its Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint, which was filed with this Court on May 5, 2015. 5 The parties have been engaged in negotiations to resolve this matter, but as these attempts were not 6 successful, the parties have now agreed that Defendant may respond to Plaintiff’s complaint on 7 July 10, 2015. The parties also stipulate and consent to the jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge Nathanael 8 9 Cousins for all purposes in this case. Additionally, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-2, the parties 10 11 stipulate and request an order rescheduling the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter, 12 currently scheduled for August 5, 2015, to August 19, 2015 (or in the alternative, August 12 or 13 August 26, 2015). The parties request this enlargement of time because Plaintiff’s counsel, Alan 14 Adelman, and lead defense counsel, Mark S. Spring, are unavailable to appear on August 5, 2015. 15 Mr. Adelman will be on a backpacking trip in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, and Mark S. Spring is 16 on a prepaid vacation the week of August 2 due to his sister’s wedding. Declaration of Teresa W. 17 Ghali ¶ 2. The stipulation to extend time to respond to the Complaint and stipulated request to 18 reschedule the Initial CMC are the first requests for time modification in this case; these extensions 19 will not affect the parties’ ability to proceed with this litigation in a timely fashion. Id. 20 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 21 Dated: June 26, 2015 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP 22 24 By: /s/ Teresa W. Ghali Teresa W. Ghali Attorneys for Defendant COMCAST CORPORATION 25 Dated: June 26, 2015 Law Offices of Alan Adelman 23 26 By: /s/ Alan Adelman 27 Alan Adelman Attorney for Plaintiff DAVIN MONTOYA 1 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 943498.1 1 DECLARATION OF TERESA W. GHALI 1. 2 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all of the courts in the State 3 of California. I am an associate with the law firm of Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP 4 (“CDF”), counsel of record for Comcast Corporation (“Defendant” or “Comcast”) in this action. I 5 have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Declaration and, if called as a witness, could 6 and would testify competently to such facts under oath. 2. 7 The parties request that the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter, 8 currently scheduled for August 5, 2015, be moved to August 19, 2015, or in the alternative, August 9 12 or August 26, 2015. The parties seek this enlargement of time because Plaintiff’s counsel and 10 lead defense counsel, Mark S. Spring, are unavailable to appear on August 5, 2015. Mr. Adelman 11 has informed our firm that he will be on a backpacking trip in the Sierra Nevada Mountains during 12 that week. Mr. Spring is lead trial counsel and he has informed me that he is on vacation from late 13 July through August 8, in New York, as his sister is getting married during this time in New York. 3. 14 The stipulation to extend time to respond to the Complaint and stipulated request to 15 reschedule the Initial CMC are the first requests for time modification in this case; these extensions 16 will not affect the parties’ ability to proceed with this litigation in a timely fashion. Id. 4. 17 Per Northern District Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that I have obtained authorization 18 from Plaintiff’s counsel, Alan Adelman, to file this Stipulation on his behalf. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United 19 20 States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 26th day of June, 2015, at San Francisco, California. 21 22 /s/ Teresa W. Ghali Teresa W. Ghali 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 943498.1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 3 The Initial Case Management Conference in this action shall take place on August __, 2015. 4 Joint case management statement due August 12, 2015. UNIT ED NO 9 RT 10 . thanael M Judge Na ER 12 A H 11 Cousins R NIA 8 Honorable TED Nathanael Cousins AN GRMagistrate Judge FO 7 LI 6 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 5 N F D IS T IC T O R C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 943498.1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?