MicroTechnologies, LLC v. Autonomy, Inc. et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER 9 for Continuance of Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/26/15. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2015)

1
2
3
4

Neil A. Goteiner (State Bar No. 083524)
[e-mail]
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant AUTONOMY, INC. and
Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
MICROTECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Case No. 15-cv-2220

12
Plaintiff,

STIPULATION AND []
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

13
vs.
14
15

AUTONOMY, INC. (also known as HP
AUTONOMY),

16
Defendant,
17
and
18
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,
19
Nominal Defendant.
20
21
22
23

This Stipulation is entered into by and among MicroTechnologies, LLC, Plaintiff, and
Defendants Autonomy, Inc. and Nominal Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”), by and
through their respective counsel.

24
25
26
27

STIPULATION
WHEREAS, Nominal Defendant HP’s and Defendant Autonomy Inc.’s (referred to
collectively as “Defendants”) responses to MicroTechnologies, LLC’s (“MicroTechnologies”)
Complaint are presently due June 10, 2015; and

28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

STIPULATION AND ORDER –
Case No. 15-cv-2220

29320\4919470.2

1
2
3
4
5
6

WHEREAS, Defendants request until June 30, 2015, to respond to MicroTechnologies’
Complaint, and MicroTechnologies assents to such requested extension;
NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED
AND AGREED, by and among Defendants and MicroTechnologies that:
Defendants may file their respective responses to MicroTechnologies’ Complaint on
June 30, 2015.

7
8
9

IT IS SO STIPULATED

10
11

Dated: June 8, 2015

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

12
13

By: /s/ Neil A. Goteiner
Neil A. Goteiner
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104

14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendants
AUTONOMY, INC., and HEWLETTPACKARD COMPANY

17
18
19

Dated: June 8, 2015

20

By: /s/ Geoffrey C. Rushing
R. Alexander Saveri
Geoffrey C. Rushing
Cadio Zirpoli
SAVERI & SAVERI, INC.
706 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111

21
22
23
24

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MicroTechnologies, LLC

25
26
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

STIPULATION AND ORDER –
Case No. 15-cv-2220

-2-

29320\4919470.2

1
2

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
I, Neil A. Goteiner, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

3

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Continuance of Time to Respond to Complaint. In

4

compliance with N.D. Cal. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Geoffrey C. Rushing has concurred

5

in this filing.
Farella Braun + Martel LLP

6
7

/s/ Neil A. Goteiner
Neil A. Goteiner

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

STIPULATION AND ORDER –
Case No. 15-cv-2220

-3-

29320\4919470.2

1

[] ORDER

2
Pursuant to the Stipulation, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
3
Defendants’ time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint is extended until June 30, 2015.
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June __, 2015

__________________________________
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

STIPULATION AND ORDER –
Case No. 15-cv-2220

-4-

29320\4919470.2