MicroTechnologies, LLC v. Autonomy, Inc. et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER 24 Selecting ADR Process. Case Referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 8/11/15. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2015)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MicroTechnologies, LLC
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Autonomy, Inc. and
Hewlett-Packard Co.

CASE NO. ______________________
5:15-cv-02220-RMW
STIPULATION AND []
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
The parties do not believe
✔
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
that formal ADR will be helpful, as the parties are already engaged in settlement negotiations.
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
✔
9

Parties to report on settlement discussions by 12/11/15.
other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________
8/11/15

____________________________
/s/ Cadio Zirpoli
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________
8/11/15

____________________________
/s/ Neil A. Goteiner
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[] ORDER
9
9

Dated:

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________
DISTRICT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2