Lee v. County of Santa Cruz et al

Filing 19

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 8, 2016. (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BRIAN LEE, Plaintiff, 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 9 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al., Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-02231-PSG 12 13 Plaintiff Brian Lee filed his complaint on May 18, 2015.1 He later requested that the 14 deadline to serve Defendants County of Santa Cruz et al. be extended to December 18, 2015.2 The 15 court granted this request.3 On January 26, 2015, the court ordered Lee to show cause why the 16 case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, because he still had not served Defendants 17 and had not appeared at a scheduled case management conference.4 Lee requested that the 18 deadline for service be extended a second time, to April 4, 2016, and the court granted his 19 request.5 Lee still has not served Defendants or notified the court of the need for a third extension. 20 No later than April 15, 2016, Lee shall show cause in writing why this case should not be 21 dismissed for failure to prosecute. 22 1 See Docket No. 1 2 See Docket No. 13. 3 See Docket No. 14. 4 See Docket No. 16. 5 See Docket Nos. 17, 18. 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 5:15-cv-02231-PSG ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 1 SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: April 8, 2016 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 5:15-cv-02231-PSG ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?