Chang v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 30

ORDER AFTER INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, granting 29 . Signed by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte on 9/14/2015. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

JAMES McMANIS (40958)
TYLER ATKINSON (257997)
HILARY WEDDELL (293276)
McMANIS FAULKNER
50 W. San Fernando Street, 10th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
SHIOW-HUEY CHANG
ORRY P. KORB, County Counsel (S.B. #114399)
DAVID M. ROLLO, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #111998)
ARYN PAIGE HARRIS, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #208590)
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, Ninth Floor
San Jose, California 95110-1770
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants,
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, SANTA CLARA
COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, DEPUTY DANIEL
J. FOREST, and DEPUTY STRICKLAND

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18

SHIOW-HUEY CHANG,

19
20
21
22
23
24

Case No.

15-CV-02502 RMW

Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER AFTER INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

vs.
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, a public
entity, SANTA CLARA COUNTY
SHERIFF’S OFFICE, a department of the
County of Santa Clara, DEPUTY DANIEL
J. FOREST, an individual, DEPUTY
STRICKLAND, an individual, and DOES 150, inclusive,

25
Defendants.
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER AFTER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; Case No.: 15-CV-02502 RMW

1

An Initial Case Management Conference was held before the Honorable Ronald Whyte on

2

September 11, 2015, for the above entitled case. Tyler Atkinson and Hilary Weddell of McManis

3

Faulkner appeared for plaintiff, Shiow-Huey Chang. David Rollo appeared on behalf of defendants.

4

The following determinations were made:

5

Discovery
Subject to further order, discovery shall be limited to the following:

6
7



Depositions: no more than ten (10) per side.

8



Interrogatories: no more than twenty-five (25) per side.

9



Requests for Production of Documents: No limit but must be narrowly tailored.

10



Request for Admissions: no more than ten (10) per side.

11

Schedule

12



Last day to amend pleadings: 11/6/2015.

13



Fact discovery cut-off: 11/25/2015.

14



Deadline for opening expert reports: 2/25/2016.

15



Deadline for rebuttal expert reports: 3/24/2016.

16



Expert discovery cut-off: 4/29/2016.

17



Last day to hear dispositive motions: 4/29/2016 at 9:30 AM.

18



Pretrial Conference set for 5/26/2016 at 2:00 PM.

19



Jury Trial set for 7/11/2016 at 1:30 PM.

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28
[PROPOSED] ORDER AFTER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; Case No.: 15-CV-02502 RMW

2

1
2

Alternative Dispute Resolution
The Case is referred to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins for settlement. The

3

settlement conference is to be completed within 90 days. If parties believe that there is no

4

opportunity for case to be resolved before a settlement judge, the parties may request leave of court

5

to appoint a mediator.

6
7

APPROVED as to Form:

8

DATED: September 11, 2015

McMANIS FAULKNER

9
__/s/________________
JAMES McMANIS
TYLER ATKINSON
HILARY WEDDELL

10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Plaintiff

14
15

DATED: September 11, 2015

__/s/________________
DAVID ROLLO
Attorney for Defendants

16
17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20

DATED: ________________________
9/14/2015

_____________________________________
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER AFTER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; Case No.: 15-CV-02502 RMW

3