Moore v. State of California et al
Filing
26
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/29/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DERRICK D. MOORE,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No. 15-cv-02687 NC (PR)
Plaintiff,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
13
14
15
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA,
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff Derrick D. Moore, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a
civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 18, 2017, Defendant filed a
motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s opposition was due on May 16, 2017.
However, Plaintiff has not had any communication with the Court since February
21
11, 2016. On June 13, 2017, the Court sua sponte granted Plaintiff an extension of time
22
within which to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff
23
24
25
26
27
28
was directed to file an opposition no later than June 28, 2017. In that same order, Plaintiff
was cautioned that the failure to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary
judgment may be deemed to be a consent to the granting of the motion, and the granting of
judgment against Plaintiff without a trial, and that the failure to comply with the Court’s
Case No. 15-cv-02687 NC (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
1
2
3
order may result in the dismissal of this case for the failure to prosecute.
To date, Plaintiff has not filed anything with the Court. Accordingly, this case is
DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
DATED:
June 29, 2017
7
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 15-cv-02687 NC (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?