Mujadadi-Turan v. Motorola Mobility, LLC et al

Filing 38

ORDER GRANTING 37 Stipulation to Continue Deadline For Defendants Motorola Mobility, LLC and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Motorola Mobility, LLC. Response due 1/8/2016. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/9/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2015)

S
6
7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

NIA MUJADADI-TURAN,

11
12
13
14
15

R NIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

10

E R DATED: 12/9/2015 C
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R

H

5

J

. D av i l a

FO

RT

4

w a rd J
u d ge E d

LI

NO

3

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

A

2

UNIT
ED

Counsel Appear On The Following Page

RT
U
O

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

Plaintiff,
v.
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC;
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,

CASE NO. 5:15-CV-2752 (EJD)
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC AND
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150

CASE NO. 5-15-CV-2572(EJD)
1.
Joint Stipulation To Continue Deadline For Defendants Motorola Mobility, LLC And Metropolitan Life Insurance
Company To Respond To Plaintiff’s Complaint

1

JOINT STIPULATION

2

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff Nia Mujadadi-Turan (“Plaintiff”) and

3

Defendants Motorola Mobility, LLC (“Motorola”) and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

4

(“MetLife”) (Plaintiff, Motorola, and MetLife are referred to as the “Parties”), hereby jointly

5

stipulate to a fifth extension of time for Motorola and MetLife to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

6

Pursuant to the Parties Agreement, the deadline for Motorola and MetLife to file their respective

7

responses to Plaintiff’s Complaint will be continued from December 9, 2015 to January 8, 2016. In

8

support of this Stipulation, the Parties agree and stipulate as follows:

9

1.

On June 18, 2015, Plaintiff initiated the present action against Motorola and

10

MetLife in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (See ECF, Doc.

11

No. 1.)

12
13

2.

3.

Motorola was served with the Summons and Complaint in this action on July

4.

The Parties submitted stipulations extended the deadline for MetLife to

26, 2015.

14
15

MetLife was served with the Summons and Complaint in this action on June

21, 2015.

16
17

respond to the Complaint to facilitate on-going settlement discussions (See ECF Doc. Nos. 11, 14,

18

20, 25, 29.) Where required, the Court granted each of these stipulations. (See ECF Doc. Nos. 22,

19

28, 31.)

20

5.

The Parties submitted stipulations extended the deadline for Motorola to

21

respond to the Complaint to facilitate on-going settlement discussions (See ECF Doc. Nos. 13, 21,

22

24, 30.) Where required, the Court granted each of these stipulations. (See ECF Doc. Nos. 23, 27,

23

32.)

24

6.

On December 8, 2015, the Parties have agreed to a further thirty (30) day

25

extension of time for Motorola and MetLife to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Accordingly,

26

Motorola and MetLife’s respective responses to the Complaint are now due on or before January 8,

27

2016.

28
2.

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150

CASE NO. 5-15-CV-2572(EJD)
Joint Stipulation To Continue Deadline For Defendants Motorola Mobility, LLC And Metropolitan Life Insurance
Company To Respond To Plaintiff’s Complaint

1

7.

The Parties are optimistic that a resolution can be reached in this matter and

2

the additional time will afford the parties the opportunity to continue their settlement opportunities

3

without incurring additional costs of litigation.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

8.

This Stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already

fixed by Court order.
9.

This is the sixth extension of time sought in this matter on behalf of MetLife

and the fifth extension of time sought on behalf of Motorola.
We hereby attest that we have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any
signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
Dated: December 8, 2015

11

/s/ Beth A. Davis
BETH A. DAVIS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
NIA MUJADADI-TURAN

12
13
14

Dated: December 8, 2015

15

/s/ Benjamin A. Emmert
BENJAMIN A. EMMERT
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC

16
17
18
19

Dated: December 8, 2015

20

/s/ C. Andrew Kitchen
C. ANDREW KITCHEN
MAYNARD, COOPER, & GALE, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY

21
22
23
24
25

Firmwide:137461992.1 071264.1013

26
27
28
3.

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150

CASE NO. 5-15-CV-2572(EJD)
Joint Stipulation To Continue Deadline For Defendants Motorola Mobility, LLC And Metropolitan Life Insurance
Company To Respond To Plaintiff’s Complaint

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Glenn Kantor - SBN 122643
E-mail: [e-mail]
Beth A. Davis - SBN 277560
E-mail: [e-mail]
Andrew Kantor – SBN 303093
E-mail: [e-mail]
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, CA 91324
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
NIA MUJADADI-TURAN
BENJAMIN A. EMMERT, Bar No. 212157
[e-mail]
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
A Professional Corporation
50 West San Fernando Street
15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 408.288.5686
Attorneys for Defendant
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC
C. ANDREW KITCHEN (SBN 292609)
[e-mail]
LINDA B. OLIVER (SBN 166720)
[e-mail]
ALEXANDRA V. DRURY (SBN 291920)
[e-mail]
MAYNARD, COOPER, & GALE, LLP
600 Montgomery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

23
24
25
26
27
28
1.

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150

CASE NO. 5-15-CV-2572(EJD)
Joint Stipulation To Continue Deadline For Defendants Motorola Mobility, LLC And Metropolitan Life Insurance
Company To Respond To Plaintiff’s Complaint