Khuc et al v. Peninsular Investments, Inc. et al

Filing 75

ORDER STRIKING 74 NOTICE OF NEW EVIDENCE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/18/2016. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2016)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

SAN JOSE DIVISION

6
7

THUAN KHUC, et al.,

Case No. 15-cv-02898-BLF

Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
PENINSULAR INVESTMENTS, INC., et
al.,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

ORDER STRIKING NOTICE OF NEW
EVIDENCE IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants.

[Re: ECF 74]

12
13

On July 14, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a “notice of new evidence in opposition to Defendants’

14

motion to dismiss.” ECF 74. Briefing closed on Defendants’ motion to dismiss with the filing of

15

Defendants’ reply brief on May 24, 2016. The civil local rules do not contain any provision for

16

the filing of a “notice of new evidence.” Accordingly, the Court STRIKES Plaintiffs’ filing and

17

reminds the parties that all filings must comply with this Court’s standing orders, the local rules,

18

and the federal rules.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 18, 2016
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge