Mathieu v. Equifax Inc.

Filing 36

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The parties may file a response to this order demonstrating good cause why sanctions should not be imposed on or before 1/7/2016. In doing so, however, they must (1) explain their failure to comply with the original deadline to file one of the ADR forms, and (2) must also file one of the forms contemplated by the December 12th Order. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 1/14/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward. J. Davila. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/5/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

10
11

DARRELL MATHIEU,

Case No. 5:15-cv-03053-EJD

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Plaintiff,
12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.
13
14
15
16

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC.,
Defendant.
On December 12, 2015, the court issued an order requiring the parties to meet and confer

17

in order to reach an agreement on one ADR process and file, within 10 days, either (1) the form

18

entitled “Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Selecting ADR Process” if an agreement is reached on

19

one form of ADR, or (2) the form entitled “Notice of Need of ADR Phone Conference.” See

20

Docket Item No. 35. As of the date and time this was order was filed, the parties have not

21

complied and the time for compliance has expired.

22

Accordingly, the parties are ordered to appear before the Honorable Edward J. Davila on

23

January 14, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 4, 5th Floor, United States District Court, 280

24

S. First Street, San Jose, California, 95113, to show cause why the court should not impose any

25

and all appropriate sanctions, including monetary sanctions or dismissal of this action, on the

26
27
28

parties, or any of them, for willful disobedience of a court order.
The parties may file a response to this order demonstrating good cause why sanctions
1
Case No.: 5:15-cv-03053-EJD
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

should not be imposed on or before January 7, 2016. In doing so, however, they must (1) explain

2

their failure to comply with the original deadline to file one of the ADR forms, and (2) must also

3

file one of the forms contemplated by the December 12th Order.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 5, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No.: 5:15-cv-03053-EJD
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE