Alias v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 15

ORDER GRANTING 14 Stipulation to Extend Time for Asset Acceptance to Respond to Complaint filed by Asset Acceptance, LLC. Response due 8/28/2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/27/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2015)

Download PDF
6 Attorneys for Defendant Asset Acceptance, LLC R NIA J . D av i l a FO d w a rd J u d ge E A E R DATED: 7/27/2015 C N F D IS T IC T O R H 5 RT 4 I NO 3 ERED ORD T IS SO LI S 2 tnarita@snllp.com LIANA MAYILYAN (SBN 295203) lmayilyan@snllp.com SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3010 San Francisco, CA 94104-4816 Telephone: (415) 283-1000 Facsimile: (415) 352-2625 UNIT ED 1 TOMIO B. NARITA (SBN 156576) RT U O S DISTRICT TE C TA 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 SABRENA ALIAS, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) ) ) EXPERIAN INFORMATION ) SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANSUNION, ) LLC; GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC; ) COUNTRY FINANCIAL ) SERVICES; BARCLAY'S BANK ) DELAWARE; SCHOOLS ) FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION; ) WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL ) NATIONAL BANK; ASSET ) ACCEPTANCE, LLC, and DOES 1 ) through 100 inclusive, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) CASE NO.: 5:15-cv-03057-EJD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT Complaint Filed: May 19, 2015 Complaint Served: June 1, 2015 Removal Date: July 1, 2015 Current Response Date: July 8, 2015 New Response Date: August 28, 2015 23 24 25 26 27 28 ALIAS v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. (CASE NO.: 5:15-cv-03057-EJD) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Sabrena Alias 2 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Asset Acceptance, LLC (“Defendant”), by and through 3 the undersigned counsel of record, as follows: 4 WHEREAS, on May 19, 2015, Plaintiff filed her Complaint in the Superior 5 Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, Case No. 115-CV-280853; 6 WHEREAS, on June 1, 2015, Plaintiff served the Complaint on Defendant; 7 WHEREAS, on June 4, 2015, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (sued as 8 “Wells Fargo Financial National Bank” and as “Wells Fargo”) removed the action to 9 this Court; 10 WHEREAS, Defendant’s initial deadline to respond to the Complaint was July 11 8, 2015; 12 WHEREAS, Defendant requires additional time to investigate the claims 13 asserted in the Complaint and prepare its response to the Complaint; 14 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend the date for Defendant to 15 respond to the Complaint from July 8, 2015, to August 28, 2015; 16 WHEREAS, Defendants has not previously sought a continuance; 17 WHEREAS, this Stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any 18 deadline already fixed by Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil 19 Procedure; 20 THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree that Defendant’s response to the 21 Complaint in this matter shall be due no later than August 28, 2015. 22 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 23 24 DATED: July 23, 2015 25 26 27 28 SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP TOMIO B. NARITA LIANA MAYILYAN By: /s/ Liana Mayilyan Liana Mayilyan Attorneys for Defendant Asset Acceptance, LLC ALIAS v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. (CASE NO.: 5:15-cv-03057-EJD) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC TO RESPOND TO INITIAL 1 COMPLAINT 1 DATED: July 23, 2015 SAGARIA LAW, P.C. ELLIOT W. GALE 2 By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale Elliot W. Gale Attorneys for Plaintiff Sabrena Alias 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 I, Liana Mayilyan, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation. I hereby attest that Elliot W. Gale has concurred in this filing. /s/ Liana Mayilyan 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ALIAS v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. (CASE NO.: 5:15-cv-03057-EJD) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC TO RESPOND TO INITIAL 2 COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?