Alias v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
15
ORDER GRANTING 14 Stipulation to Extend Time for Asset Acceptance to Respond to Complaint filed by Asset Acceptance, LLC. Response due 8/28/2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/27/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2015)
6 Attorneys for Defendant
Asset Acceptance, LLC
R NIA
J . D av i l
a
FO
d w a rd
J u d ge E
A
E R DATED: 7/27/2015 C
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
H
5
RT
4
I
NO
3
ERED
ORD
T IS SO
LI
S
2
tnarita@snllp.com
LIANA MAYILYAN (SBN 295203)
lmayilyan@snllp.com
SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3010
San Francisco, CA 94104-4816
Telephone: (415) 283-1000
Facsimile: (415) 352-2625
UNIT
ED
1 TOMIO B. NARITA (SBN 156576)
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
SABRENA ALIAS,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
)
SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANSUNION, )
LLC; GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC;
)
COUNTRY FINANCIAL
)
SERVICES; BARCLAY'S BANK
)
DELAWARE; SCHOOLS
)
FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION;
)
WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL
)
NATIONAL BANK; ASSET
)
ACCEPTANCE, LLC, and DOES 1
)
through 100 inclusive,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 5:15-cv-03057-EJD
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANT ASSET
ACCEPTANCE, LLC TO RESPOND
TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
Complaint Filed: May 19, 2015
Complaint Served: June 1, 2015
Removal Date: July 1, 2015
Current Response Date: July 8, 2015
New Response Date: August 28, 2015
23
24
25
26
27
28
ALIAS v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. (CASE NO.: 5:15-cv-03057-EJD)
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
COMPLAINT
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Sabrena Alias
2 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Asset Acceptance, LLC (“Defendant”), by and through
3 the undersigned counsel of record, as follows:
4
WHEREAS, on May 19, 2015, Plaintiff filed her Complaint in the Superior
5 Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, Case No. 115-CV-280853;
6
WHEREAS, on June 1, 2015, Plaintiff served the Complaint on Defendant;
7
WHEREAS, on June 4, 2015, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (sued as
8 “Wells Fargo Financial National Bank” and as “Wells Fargo”) removed the action to
9 this Court;
10
WHEREAS, Defendant’s initial deadline to respond to the Complaint was July
11 8, 2015;
12
WHEREAS, Defendant requires additional time to investigate the claims
13 asserted in the Complaint and prepare its response to the Complaint;
14
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend the date for Defendant to
15 respond to the Complaint from July 8, 2015, to August 28, 2015;
16
WHEREAS, Defendants has not previously sought a continuance;
17
WHEREAS, this Stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any
18 deadline already fixed by Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil
19 Procedure;
20
THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree that Defendant’s response to the
21 Complaint in this matter shall be due no later than August 28, 2015.
22
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
23
24 DATED: July 23, 2015
25
26
27
28
SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP
TOMIO B. NARITA
LIANA MAYILYAN
By: /s/ Liana Mayilyan
Liana Mayilyan
Attorneys for Defendant
Asset Acceptance, LLC
ALIAS v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. (CASE NO.: 5:15-cv-03057-EJD)
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
1
COMPLAINT
1 DATED: July 23, 2015
SAGARIA LAW, P.C.
ELLIOT W. GALE
2
By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale
Elliot W. Gale
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Sabrena Alias
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
I, Liana Mayilyan, am the ECF user whose identification and password are
being used to file this Stipulation. I hereby attest that Elliot W. Gale has concurred
in this filing.
/s/ Liana Mayilyan
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ALIAS v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. (CASE NO.: 5:15-cv-03057-EJD)
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
2
COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?