Reyes v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
21
ORDER Re-Setting Deadlines re 11 Wells Fargo's MOTION to Dismiss and Continuing Initial Case Management Conference. Hearing on motion to dismiss set for 2/16/2016, 10:00 AM. Plaintiff's opposition due by 1/19/2016. Wells Fargo's reply due by 1/26/2016. Initial Case Management Conference continued to 4/5/2016, 1:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/6/2016. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
GABRIEL REYES,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a National
Association, NORTHWEST TRUSTEE
SERVICES, INC., a Washington
Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive
Case No. 5:15-cv-03084-HRL
ORDER RE-SETTING DEADLINES RE
WELLS FARGO'S MOTION TO
DISMISS AND CONTINUING INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Defendants.
Based on the parties’ January 5, 2016 status report, the court orders as follows:
The hearing on Wells Fargo Bank’s motion to dismiss is set for February 16, 2016, 10:00
a.m. in Courtroom 2. Plaintiff’s opposition shall be filed no later than January 19, 2016. Wells
Fargo’s reply shall be filed no later than January 26, 2016.
The Initial Case Management Conference is continued to April 5, 2016, 1:30 p.m. All
related deadlines are adjusted accordingly.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 6, 2016
______________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD
United States Magistrate Judge
1
2
5:15-cv-03084-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Edward Robert Ramirez
err@ramirezassociatesllp.com
3
Gurinder Singh Grewal
gsg@severson.com, jc@severson.com, jfa@severson.com
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?