Reyes v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 21

ORDER Re-Setting Deadlines re 11 Wells Fargo's MOTION to Dismiss and Continuing Initial Case Management Conference. Hearing on motion to dismiss set for 2/16/2016, 10:00 AM. Plaintiff's opposition due by 1/19/2016. Wells Fargo's reply due by 1/26/2016. Initial Case Management Conference continued to 4/5/2016, 1:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/6/2016. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 GABRIEL REYES, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a National Association, NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES, INC., a Washington Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive Case No. 5:15-cv-03084-HRL ORDER RE-SETTING DEADLINES RE WELLS FARGO'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendants. Based on the parties’ January 5, 2016 status report, the court orders as follows: The hearing on Wells Fargo Bank’s motion to dismiss is set for February 16, 2016, 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2. Plaintiff’s opposition shall be filed no later than January 19, 2016. Wells Fargo’s reply shall be filed no later than January 26, 2016. The Initial Case Management Conference is continued to April 5, 2016, 1:30 p.m. All related deadlines are adjusted accordingly. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 6, 2016 ______________________________ HOWARD R. LLOYD United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 5:15-cv-03084-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: Edward Robert Ramirez err@ramirezassociatesllp.com 3 Gurinder Singh Grewal gsg@severson.com, jc@severson.com, jfa@severson.com 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?