Berrywiggins v. Wells Fargo N.A. et al

Filing 8

ORDER Referring Case to ADR Unit for Assessment Telephone Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/13/2015. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 SUSAN BERRYWIGGINS, Case No. 5:15-cv-03116-HRL Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 WELLS FARGO N.A., et al., ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE Defendants. 16 17 18 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the court refers this 19 foreclosure-related action to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Unit for a telephone 20 conference to assess this case's suitability for mediation or a settlement conference. Plaintiff and 21 defendants' counsel shall participate in a telephone conference, to be scheduled by the ADR Unit 22 as soon as possible but no later than August 10, 2015. 23 Plaintiff and defendant's counsel shall be prepared to discuss the following subjects: 24 25 (1) Identification and description of claims and alleged defects in loan documents. 26 (2) Prospects for loan modification. 27 (3) Prospects for settlement. 28 The parties need not submit written materials to the ADR Unit for the telephone 1 2 3 4 5 conference. In preparation for the telephone conference, plaintiff shall do the following: (1) Review relevant loan documents and investigate the claims to determine whether they have merit. (2) If plaintiff is seeking a loan modification to resolve all or some of the claims, 6 plaintiff shall prepare a current, accurate financial statement and gather all of the 7 information and documents customarily needed to support a loan modification 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 request. Further, plaintiff shall immediately notify defendants' counsel of the request for a loan modification. (3) Provide counsel for defendants with information necessary to evaluate the prospects for loan modification, in the form of a financial statement, worksheet or application customarily used by financial institutions. (4) In preparation for the telephone conference, counsel for defendants shall do the 13 following. 14 (5) If defendants are unable or unwilling to do a loan modification after receiving 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 notice of plaintiff's request, counsel for defendants shall promptly notify plaintiff to that effect. (6) Arrange for a representative of each defendant with full settlement authority to participate in the telephone conference. The ADR Unit will notify the parties of the date and time that the telephone conference will be held. After the telephone conference, the ADR Unit will advise the court of its recommendation for further ADR proceedings. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 13, 2015 ______________________________________ HOWARD R. LLOYD United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28 2 1 2 5:15-cv-03116-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: Daniel A Armstrong darmstrong@afrct.com, AFRCTECF@afrct.com, emartinez@afrct.com, kwooten@afrct.com, lvelasquez@afrct.com 3 4 Robert Arthur Bailey knielsen@afrct.com rbailey@afrct.com, AFRCTECF@afrct.com, hsaller@afrct.com, 5 6 5:15-cv-03116-HRL Notice sent by U.S. Mail to: 7 Marc Applbaum Kettner Law Corporation 2150 West Washington Street #104 San Diego, CA 92110 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?