Michele McGee v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 29

ORDER GRANTING 28 Amended Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Michelle McGee 27 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Michelle McGee. Wells Fargo Dealer Services terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/11/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2015)

S

R NIA

vila

FO

rd J . D a

LI

RT

d wa
J u d ge E

H

E R DATED: 9/11/2015 C
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

A

UNIT
ED

RT
U
O

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

NO

1 Scott J. Sagaria (State Bar No. 217981)
Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)
2 Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)
Sagaria Law P.C.
3 2033 Gateway Place, 5th Floor
San Jose, California 95110
4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN JOSE DIVISION

9
10 MICHELE MCGEE,

Case No. 5:15-cv-03124-EJD

11

PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED NOTICE OF
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO DEALER
SERVICES, A DIVISION OF WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A. FOR ITSELF AND
AS SUCCESSOR TO WACHOVIA
DEALER SERVICES PURSUANT TO
FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)

12

Plaintiff,
vs.

13 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC., el. al.
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Michele McGee, pursuant to Federal rule of Civil
19
Procedure 41(a)(1), hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant Wells Fargo Dealer Services, a
20
Division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for itself and as successor to Wachovia Dealer Services
21

(hereinafter “Wells Fargo”) as to all claims in this action.

22
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides, in relevant part:
23
41(a) Voluntary Dismissal.
24
(1) By the Plaintiff.
25
(a) Without a Court Order. Subject to Rules 23(3), 23.1(c), 23.2, and 66 and
26
any applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a
27
court order by filing:
28
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT

1

(1) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party service either an

2

answer or a motion for summary judgment.

3

Defendant Wells Fargo has neither answered Plaintiff’s Complaint, nor filed a motion for

4 summary judgment. Accordingly, the matter may be dismissed against it for all purposes and
5 without an Order of the Court.
6
7 DATED: September 10, 2015
8

SAGARIA LAW
A Professional Corporation

9
10

By:

/s/Elliot W. Gale
Elliot W. Gale

11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff Michele McGee

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO DEALER SERVICES