Dang v. City Of San Jose
Filing
33
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/4/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2016)
1 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO
Dale K. Galipo, Esq. (SBN 144074)
2 dalekgalipo@yahoo.com
21800 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 310
3 Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Telephone: (818) 347-3333
4 Facsimile: (818) 347-4118
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DANG, HOANG, individually and as
10 successor in interest of TRACEY LIEN
TRAN, deceased,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
CASE NO. 15-CV-03177-NC
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS
TO ALL DEFENDANTS
Magistrate N. Cousins
CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
TO ALL PARTIES AND THIS HONORABLE COURT:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action,
19
20
21
22
23
24
through their designated counsel, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with
prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1) as to all
defendants. The parties request that the Court enter an order forthwith dismissing
this entire action with prejudice as to all causes of action and parties. Each side is to
bear its own costs and fees.
25
It is so stipulated.
26 //
27 //
28
1
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Case No.15-CV-03177-NC
1 DATED: August _1_, 2016
2
LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO
3
By:
4
5
/s/ Dale K. Galipo
Dale K. Galipo
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
7
8 DATED: August _1_, 2016
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
9
10
By:
11
12
/s/ Cliff Greenberg
Cliff Greenberg
Attorneys for Defendants
13
14
ORDER
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
R NIA
S
ER
thanae
26
FO
Judge Na
H
25
RT
24
MAGISTRATE JUDGE NATHANAEL COUSINS
UNITED STATES DISTRICTins
l M. Cous COURT
NO
23
TED
LI
22
GRAN
A
21
DATED: August 4, 2016
RT
U
O
20
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
UNIT
ED
19
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
27
1340962.doc
x
28
2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Case No.15-CV-03177-NC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?