Dang v. City Of San Jose

Filing 33

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/4/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2016)

Download PDF
1 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO Dale K. Galipo, Esq. (SBN 144074) 2 dalekgalipo@yahoo.com 21800 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 310 3 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Telephone: (818) 347-3333 4 Facsimile: (818) 347-4118 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DANG, HOANG, individually and as 10 successor in interest of TRACEY LIEN TRAN, deceased, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 CASE NO. 15-CV-03177-NC STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS Magistrate N. Cousins CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 TO ALL PARTIES AND THIS HONORABLE COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, 19 20 21 22 23 24 through their designated counsel, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1) as to all defendants. The parties request that the Court enter an order forthwith dismissing this entire action with prejudice as to all causes of action and parties. Each side is to bear its own costs and fees. 25 It is so stipulated. 26 // 27 // 28 1 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION Case No.15-CV-03177-NC 1 DATED: August _1_, 2016 2 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO 3 By: 4 5 /s/ Dale K. Galipo Dale K. Galipo Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 7 8 DATED: August _1_, 2016 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 9 10 By: 11 12 /s/ Cliff Greenberg Cliff Greenberg Attorneys for Defendants 13 14 ORDER 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 R NIA S ER thanae 26 FO Judge Na H 25 RT 24 MAGISTRATE JUDGE NATHANAEL COUSINS UNITED STATES DISTRICTins l M. Cous COURT NO 23 TED LI 22 GRAN A 21 DATED: August 4, 2016 RT U O 20 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED 19 N F D IS T IC T O R C 27 1340962.doc x 28 2 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION Case No.15-CV-03177-NC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?