City Of San Jose v. Monsanto Company et al

Filing 152

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/29/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Robert M. Howard (Bar No. 145870)
Kelly E. Richardson (Bar No. 210511)
Jennifer Casler-Goncalves (Bar No. 259438)
12670 High Bluff Drive
San Diego, California 92130
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 858.523.5450
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Andrea M. Hogan (Bar No. 238209)
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.395.8095
Email: [e-mail]

10
11

Attorneys for Defendants Monsanto Company,
Solutia Inc., and Pharmacia LLC

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN JOSE DIVISION

15
16

CITY OF SAN JOSE,

17
18
19
20

Plaintiff,
v.
MONSANTO COMPANY, SOLUTIA INC.,
and PHARMACIA CORPORATION, and
DOES 1 through 100,

21

24
25
26

File Date:

July 8, 2015

As modified below
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE MOTION TO
ENLARGE TIME TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
CERTIFICATION OF ORDER FOR
APPEAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)

Defendants.
The Honorable Edward J. Davila

22
23

CASE NO. 5:15-cv-03178-EJD

CITY OF OAKLAND,

CASE NO. 5:15-cv-05152-EJD
(Related Case)

Plaintiff,
v.

File Date: November 10, 2015

MONSANTO COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

27
28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN DIEGO

5:15-cv-03178-EJD; 5:15-cv-05152-EJD; 5:16-cv-0071-EJD
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFS.’
MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME

1

CITY OF BERKELEY,

2
3
4
5

CASE NO. 5:16-cv-00071-EJD
(Related Case)

Plaintiff,
v.

File Date: January 6, 2016

MONSANTO COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN DIEGO

CASE NO. 15-cv-03178-EJD
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFS.’
MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME

1

Defendants Monsanto Company, Solutia Inc., and Pharmacia LLC (“Defendants”) have

2

requested an extension of time to file a Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Certification of Order

3

for Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). San Jose Dkt. No. 147; Oakland Dkt. No. 118;

4

Berkeley Dkt. No. 111 (“Motion for Certification of Appeal”). Having considered all papers

5

submitted in support of Defendants’ Ex Parte Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’

6

Motion for Certification of Appeal, all other pleadings and papers on file, and all arguments

7

presented by counsel, the Court HEREBY GRANTS Defendants’ Ex Parte Motion to Enlarge

8

Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Certification of Appeal. Defendants’ Response to

9

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Certification of Appeal shall be due on November 17, 2017.

10

September 14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12

August 29, 2017
Dated: _______________
The Honorable Edward J. Davila
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN DIEGO

1

5:15-cv-03178-EJD; 5:15-cv-05152-EJD; 5:16-cv-0071-EJD
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFS.’
MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME