Neal v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
Filing
12
ORDER That Case Be Reassigned to a District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/3/2015. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
RALPH NEAL,
Case No. 5:15-cv-03212-HRL
Plaintiff,
13
v.
ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED
TO A DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC;
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; and DOES 120, inclusive,
Defendants.
17
Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 73-1, all parties
18
were required to file, no later than July 27, 2015, either (1) a Consent to Proceed Before a United
19
States Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Request for
20
Reassignment to a United States District Judge. Despite reminders from the court, not all parties
21
have done so. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Clerk of the Court shall reassign this
22
case to a District Judge. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636; Civ. L.R. 73-1.
23
SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: August 3, 2015
25
26
27
28
________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD
United States Magistrate Judge
1
2
5:15-cv-03212-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Bryan Lakeith Hawkins
maria.davis@stoel.com
bryan.hawkins@stoel.com, docketclerk@stoel.com,
3
4
5:15-cv-03212-HRL Notice sent by U.S. Mail to:
5
Ralph B. Neal
1588 Calco Creek
San Jose, CA 95127
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?