Artec Group, Inc. v. Klimov, an Individual et al
Filing
79
ORDER re Case Management Conference (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
ARTEC GROUP, INC.,
Case No. 15-cv-03449-RMW
Plaintiff,
13
v.
ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
14
15
ANDREY KLIMOV, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
A case management conference was held on December 11, 2015, The court orders as
follows:
19
1. By January 15, 2016, plaintiff shall file its amended complaint.
20
2. By February 12, 2016, the parties shall file a joint proposed protective order. If the parties
21
cannot agree to any terms of the protective order, they shall propose alternate paragraphs for
22
those terms of the order.
23
3. By February 26, 2016, the parties shall make initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of
24
Civil Procedure 26.
25
4. By March 11, 2016, the parties shall file a joint discovery plan on March 11, 2016. If the
26
parties cannot agree to any terms of the discovery plan, they shall propose alternate paragraphs
27
for those terms of the order.
1
28
15-cv-03449-RMW
ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
FC
1
5. By March 11, 2016, plaintiff shall file and serve a list of the alleged trade secrets at issue.
2
6. A further case management conference is scheduled for May 13, 2016 at 10:30 a.m.
3
7. Except as set forth in this order, no discovery will be taken until a discovery plan is entered
4
by the court.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 22, 2015
______________________________________
Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2
28
15-cv-03449-RMW
ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
FC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?