Ruskell v. North County Fire Protection District of Monterey County et al

Filing 25

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING GRANTING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (approving 23). Case Management Conference set for January 21, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 1/12/2016. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Allison V. Saunders, Bar No. 220010 E-mail: asaunders@fordharrison.com Lauren "t. Williams, Bar No. 266264 E-mail:ltwilliams fordharrison.com Ford & Harrison L P 350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2300 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213-237-2400 Facsimile: 213-237-2401 Attorneys for Defendants NORTF~~ COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF MONTEREY COUNTY and CHRIS ORMAN 8 9 10 11 12 Samantha M. Swanson, Bar No. 286954 Email: sswanson@adamsferrone.com Adams, Ferrone and Ferrone APC 4333 Park Terrace Drive, Suite 200 Westlake Village, CA 91361 Telephone: 805-373-5900 Facsimile: 818-874-1382 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff JONATHAN RUSKELL 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 JONA"l~I-IAN RUSKLLL, 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 NORTH COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF MONTEREY COUNTY,a public agency and/or municipal corporation; CHRIS ORMAN,individually and as Fire Chief; and DOES 1 THROUGH 1 U, 22 23 24 25 Case No. 15-cv-03540-BLF Hon. Beth Labson Freeman Defendants. JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSEll] ORDER REGARDING GRANTING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Filed concurrently with Joint Administrative Motion to Appear Telephonically At Initial Case Management CortferenceJ 26 27 28 FoizD & H;aRaisoiv LI,P A I'f~~uNhv~ ~i I,nw r~~ 4ni~ ~i ~~ Date: Time: Courtroom: January 21, 2016 10:00 a.m. 3 FAC Filed: Date: December 1, 2015 None Set 1 ') Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 7-12, Plaintiff Jonathan Ruskell ("Plaintiff and 2 Defendants North County Fire Protection District of Monterey County and Chris Orman 3 ("Defendants") file this stipulation regarding appearing telephonically at the Initial Case 4 Management Conference. WHEREAS, an Initial Status Conference is scheduled for January 21, 2016 at 5 6j 10:00 a.m; WHEREAS, counsel for both parties reside outside of the Northern District, 7 8, specifically in the greater Los Angeles area; 9 WHEREAS,appearing telephonically will save both parties considerable travel and 10 other expenses related to traveling to the hearing, and enable counsel to meet additional 11 obligations the day ofthe hearing; 12 WHEREAS,each party is amenable to the other appearing telephonically; 13 WHEREAS, the parties have filed a Joint Administrative Motion to Appear 14 Telephonically at the Initial Case Management Conference; 1S NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and 16 between the parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that the parties will appear 17 telephonically at the January 21, 2016 Initial Case Management Conference. 18 /// 19 i 20 /// 21 22 /// 23 24 /// 25 26 /// 27 I 28 FORD & HARRISON LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW I.n.c Ara r.ci as -]- JOfNT STIPULATION &[PROPOSED]ORDER GRANTING MOTION CASE NO.5:15-CV-03540-BLF 1'1 Dated: January 11, 2016 Respectfully submitted, Ford & Harrison LLP 2~1 3 4 A~"i~n V. Saunders fdu n T. Williams Attorneys for Defendants NORTH COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF MONTEREY COUNTY & CHRIS ORMAN 5 ~ 6 7 8 Adams,Ferrone and Ferrone APC 9 l0 11 By: 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff JONATHAN RUSKELL 13 14 15 16 [PROPOSED]ORDER 17 FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and given the parties' joint stipulation, the parties' 18 joint administrative motion to appeax telephonically at the Initial Case Management 19 Conference on January 27, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. is hereby GRANTED. 20 21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,YT SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FORD & HARRISON LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1 li.~ A vr.s'~ ~'c Dated: HONORABLE BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?