Picart v. Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office et al

Filing 35

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte dismissing for failure to diligently prosecute; granting 18 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 2/5/2016. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2016) CORRECTION OF DOCKET # 33 , 34 .

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

HECTOR LEONEL PICART,

Case No. 15-cv-03607-RMW

Plaintiff,
13
v.

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

14
15
16

Re: Dkt. No. 18, 31

SANTA CLARA COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, et al.,
Defendants.

17

Plaintiff filed this case on August 6, 2015. Dkt. No. 1. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss

18

on October 27, 2015. Dkt. No. 18. Plaintiff did not file a written opposition to the motion to

19

dismiss. Plaintiff did not appear at the initial case management conference on January 15, 2016.

20

Dkt. No. 30. On January 20, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why the case should

21

not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 31. Plaintiff did not file a written response to

22

the order to show cause. Defendants’ motion to dismiss and the order to show cause were set for

23

hearing on January 29, 2016. Dkt. Nos. Plaintiff did not appear. The court dismisses the case for

24

failure to diligently prosecute. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is also granted as unopposed.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 5, 2016
______________________________________
Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge

27
28

1
15-cv-03607-RMW
ORDER DISMISSING CASE