Microsystems Development Technologies, Inc. v. Panasonic Corporation et al
Filing
91
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/31/2015. The parties shall meet and confer and submit a proposed stipulation to stay the matter by 1/8/2016; Parties comments to the proposed stipulation are due by 1/22/2016. The Court set a Further Case Management Conference for 1/29/2016 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6, 4th floor in San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte.(rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2015)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
Master File No: 5:15-cv-03820 RMW
IN RE RESISTORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
[PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT
ORDER
As discussed at the case management conference, the Court sets the following case management
deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10 to resolve the
Intervenor United States Department of Justice’s request for a stay of discovery:
Event
Deadline
Plaintiffs, Defendants, and Intervenor U.S.
Department of Justice complete meet & confers and
file initial submissions
January 8, 2016
Responses to initial submissions
January 22, 2016
Case Management Conference
January 29, 2016 at 10:30 a.m.
If the parties are able to come to agreement about the scope of the proposed stay by January 8, the
parties shall file a single document so indicating and attach a copy of the agreed-upon proposed order to
the filing. If the parties are unable to reach agreement, each party shall submit its proposal for a stay on
January 8, which shall include a proposed order setting forth the terms of the proposed stay. To facilitate
comparison of the competing proposals, the parties shall use the Department of Justice’s proposed order
as a starting point and redline their proposed changes against that version.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 31, 2015
__________________________________
Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge
PROPOSED CASE MGMT. ORDER
No. 5:15-cv-03820-RMW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?