Microsystems Development Technologies, Inc. v. Panasonic Corporation et al

Filing 91

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/31/2015. The parties shall meet and confer and submit a proposed stipulation to stay the matter by 1/8/2016; Parties comments to the proposed stipulation are due by 1/22/2016. The Court set a Further Case Management Conference for 1/29/2016 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6, 4th floor in San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte.(rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2015)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Master File No: 5:15-cv-03820 RMW IN RE RESISTORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER As discussed at the case management conference, the Court sets the following case management deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10 to resolve the Intervenor United States Department of Justice’s request for a stay of discovery: Event Deadline Plaintiffs, Defendants, and Intervenor U.S. Department of Justice complete meet & confers and file initial submissions January 8, 2016 Responses to initial submissions January 22, 2016 Case Management Conference January 29, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. If the parties are able to come to agreement about the scope of the proposed stay by January 8, the parties shall file a single document so indicating and attach a copy of the agreed-upon proposed order to the filing. If the parties are unable to reach agreement, each party shall submit its proposal for a stay on January 8, which shall include a proposed order setting forth the terms of the proposed stay. To facilitate comparison of the competing proposals, the parties shall use the Department of Justice’s proposed order as a starting point and redline their proposed changes against that version. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 31, 2015 __________________________________ Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge PROPOSED CASE MGMT. ORDER No. 5:15-cv-03820-RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?